This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 17, 2023. It is now read-only.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fix PR #15489 (Dynamic Library Loading Support) #15760
Fix PR #15489 (Dynamic Library Loading Support) #15760
Changes from all commits
f116f10
42fda42
bb12267
cb40a02
8feb07d
ca608ff
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If CI doesn't pass, I suggest to use$(CC) and $ (CXX) and parameterize the linker so it's coming from environment as usual instead of hardcoded, if not it's not worth another CI round.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@larroy this isnt building in the CI. this is just an example. See changes in the other Makefile or CMakeLists.txt for changes to build the library in the CI
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I understand, but still this is a PITA if a Makefile doesn't respect the compiler from the environment. That's why I said is not worth another CI round. If you make other changes I would change it. Or is there a reason not to?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How does that work for windows? will it automatically have CXX be "cl" ?