-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15.4k
KAFKA-10357: Extract setup of repartition topics from Streams partition assignor #9848
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from all commits
dd1faa7
c18fbad
f879bf8
0f06eca
7b1f28d
0de63c6
195e585
f29d690
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,212 @@ | ||
| /* | ||
| * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more | ||
| * contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with | ||
| * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership. | ||
| * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0 | ||
| * (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with | ||
| * the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at | ||
| * | ||
| * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 | ||
| * | ||
| * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software | ||
| * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, | ||
| * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. | ||
| * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and | ||
| * limitations under the License. | ||
| */ | ||
| package org.apache.kafka.streams.processor.internals; | ||
|
|
||
| import org.apache.kafka.common.Cluster; | ||
| import org.apache.kafka.common.Node; | ||
| import org.apache.kafka.common.PartitionInfo; | ||
| import org.apache.kafka.common.TopicPartition; | ||
| import org.apache.kafka.common.utils.LogContext; | ||
| import org.apache.kafka.streams.errors.MissingSourceTopicException; | ||
| import org.apache.kafka.streams.errors.TaskAssignmentException; | ||
| import org.apache.kafka.streams.processor.internals.InternalTopologyBuilder.TopicsInfo; | ||
| import org.apache.kafka.streams.processor.internals.assignment.CopartitionedTopicsEnforcer; | ||
| import org.slf4j.Logger; | ||
|
|
||
| import java.util.Collection; | ||
| import java.util.Collections; | ||
| import java.util.HashMap; | ||
| import java.util.HashSet; | ||
| import java.util.Map; | ||
| import java.util.Optional; | ||
| import java.util.Set; | ||
| import java.util.stream.Collectors; | ||
|
|
||
| public class RepartitionTopics { | ||
|
|
||
| private final InternalTopicManager internalTopicManager; | ||
| private final InternalTopologyBuilder internalTopologyBuilder; | ||
| private final Cluster clusterMetadata; | ||
| private final CopartitionedTopicsEnforcer copartitionedTopicsEnforcer; | ||
| private final Logger log; | ||
| private final Map<TopicPartition, PartitionInfo> topicPartitionInfos = new HashMap<>(); | ||
|
|
||
| public RepartitionTopics(final InternalTopologyBuilder internalTopologyBuilder, | ||
| final InternalTopicManager internalTopicManager, | ||
| final CopartitionedTopicsEnforcer copartitionedTopicsEnforcer, | ||
| final Cluster clusterMetadata, | ||
| final String logPrefix) { | ||
| this.internalTopologyBuilder = internalTopologyBuilder; | ||
| this.internalTopicManager = internalTopicManager; | ||
| this.clusterMetadata = clusterMetadata; | ||
| this.copartitionedTopicsEnforcer = copartitionedTopicsEnforcer; | ||
| final LogContext logContext = new LogContext(logPrefix); | ||
| log = logContext.logger(getClass()); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| public void setup() { | ||
| final Map<Integer, TopicsInfo> topicGroups = internalTopologyBuilder.topicGroups(); | ||
| final Map<String, InternalTopicConfig> repartitionTopicMetadata = computeRepartitionTopicConfig(topicGroups, clusterMetadata); | ||
|
|
||
| // ensure the co-partitioning topics within the group have the same number of partitions, | ||
| // and enforce the number of partitions for those repartition topics to be the same if they | ||
| // are co-partitioned as well. | ||
| ensureCopartitioning(internalTopologyBuilder.copartitionGroups(), repartitionTopicMetadata, clusterMetadata); | ||
|
|
||
| // make sure the repartition source topics exist with the right number of partitions, | ||
| // create these topics if necessary | ||
| internalTopicManager.makeReady(repartitionTopicMetadata); | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Not related to this PR: when reading the
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I think we should keep this in mind. For this ticket, we need to touch |
||
|
|
||
| // augment the metadata with the newly computed number of partitions for all the | ||
| // repartition source topics | ||
| for (final Map.Entry<String, InternalTopicConfig> entry : repartitionTopicMetadata.entrySet()) { | ||
| final String topic = entry.getKey(); | ||
| final int numPartitions = entry.getValue().numberOfPartitions().orElse(-1); | ||
|
|
||
| for (int partition = 0; partition < numPartitions; partition++) { | ||
| topicPartitionInfos.put( | ||
| new TopicPartition(topic, partition), | ||
| new PartitionInfo(topic, partition, null, new Node[0], new Node[0]) | ||
| ); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| public Map<TopicPartition, PartitionInfo> topicPartitionsInfo() { | ||
| return Collections.unmodifiableMap(topicPartitionInfos); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| private Map<String, InternalTopicConfig> computeRepartitionTopicConfig(final Map<Integer, TopicsInfo> topicGroups, | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Is there a reason you renamed this from
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I thought since the returned value is a bunch of configs |
||
| final Cluster clusterMetadata) { | ||
|
|
||
| final Map<String, InternalTopicConfig> repartitionTopicConfigs = new HashMap<>(); | ||
| for (final TopicsInfo topicsInfo : topicGroups.values()) { | ||
| checkIfExternalSourceTopicsExist(topicsInfo, clusterMetadata); | ||
| repartitionTopicConfigs.putAll(topicsInfo.repartitionSourceTopics.values().stream() | ||
| .collect(Collectors.toMap(InternalTopicConfig::name, topicConfig -> topicConfig))); | ||
| } | ||
| setRepartitionSourceTopicPartitionCount(repartitionTopicConfigs, topicGroups, clusterMetadata); | ||
|
|
||
| return repartitionTopicConfigs; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| private void ensureCopartitioning(final Collection<Set<String>> copartitionGroups, | ||
| final Map<String, InternalTopicConfig> repartitionTopicMetadata, | ||
| final Cluster clusterMetadata) { | ||
| for (final Set<String> copartitionGroup : copartitionGroups) { | ||
| copartitionedTopicsEnforcer.enforce(copartitionGroup, repartitionTopicMetadata, clusterMetadata); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| private void checkIfExternalSourceTopicsExist(final TopicsInfo topicsInfo, | ||
| final Cluster clusterMetadata) { | ||
| final Set<String> missingExternalSourceTopics = new HashSet<>(topicsInfo.sourceTopics); | ||
| missingExternalSourceTopics.removeAll(topicsInfo.repartitionSourceTopics.keySet()); | ||
| missingExternalSourceTopics.removeAll(clusterMetadata.topics()); | ||
| if (!missingExternalSourceTopics.isEmpty()) { | ||
| log.error("The following source topics are missing/unknown: {}. Please make sure all source topics " + | ||
| "have been pre-created before starting the Streams application. ", | ||
| missingExternalSourceTopics); | ||
| throw new MissingSourceTopicException("Missing source topics."); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| /** | ||
| * Computes the number of partitions and sets it for each repartition topic in repartitionTopicMetadata | ||
| */ | ||
| private void setRepartitionSourceTopicPartitionCount(final Map<String, InternalTopicConfig> repartitionTopicMetadata, | ||
| final Map<Integer, TopicsInfo> topicGroups, | ||
| final Cluster clusterMetadata) { | ||
| boolean partitionCountNeeded; | ||
| do { | ||
| partitionCountNeeded = false; | ||
| boolean progressMadeThisIteration = false; // avoid infinitely looping without making any progress on unknown repartitions | ||
|
|
||
| for (final TopicsInfo topicsInfo : topicGroups.values()) { | ||
| for (final String repartitionSourceTopic : topicsInfo.repartitionSourceTopics.keySet()) { | ||
| final Optional<Integer> repartitionSourceTopicPartitionCount = | ||
| repartitionTopicMetadata.get(repartitionSourceTopic).numberOfPartitions(); | ||
|
|
||
| if (!repartitionSourceTopicPartitionCount.isPresent()) { | ||
| final Integer numPartitions = computePartitionCount( | ||
| repartitionTopicMetadata, | ||
| topicGroups, | ||
| clusterMetadata, | ||
| repartitionSourceTopic | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| if (numPartitions == null) { | ||
| partitionCountNeeded = true; | ||
| log.trace("Unable to determine number of partitions for {}, another iteration is needed", | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Maybe I'm missing something, but it looks like we want to go through the
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. @lct45 sort of; the point of So yes, if |
||
| repartitionSourceTopic); | ||
| } else { | ||
| repartitionTopicMetadata.get(repartitionSourceTopic).setNumberOfPartitions(numPartitions); | ||
| progressMadeThisIteration = true; | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| if (!progressMadeThisIteration && partitionCountNeeded) { | ||
| throw new TaskAssignmentException("Failed to compute number of partitions for all repartition topics"); | ||
| } | ||
| } while (partitionCountNeeded); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| private Integer computePartitionCount(final Map<String, InternalTopicConfig> repartitionTopicMetadata, | ||
| final Map<Integer, TopicsInfo> topicGroups, | ||
| final Cluster clusterMetadata, | ||
| final String repartitionSourceTopic) { | ||
| Integer partitionCount = null; | ||
| // try set the number of partitions for this repartition topic if it is not set yet | ||
| for (final TopicsInfo topicsInfo : topicGroups.values()) { | ||
| final Set<String> sinkTopics = topicsInfo.sinkTopics; | ||
|
|
||
| if (sinkTopics.contains(repartitionSourceTopic)) { | ||
| // if this topic is one of the sink topics of this topology, | ||
| // use the maximum of all its source topic partitions as the number of partitions | ||
| for (final String upstreamSourceTopic : topicsInfo.sourceTopics) { | ||
| Integer numPartitionsCandidate = null; | ||
| // It is possible the sourceTopic is another internal topic, i.e, | ||
| // map().join().join(map()) | ||
| if (repartitionTopicMetadata.containsKey(upstreamSourceTopic)) { | ||
| if (repartitionTopicMetadata.get(upstreamSourceTopic).numberOfPartitions().isPresent()) { | ||
| numPartitionsCandidate = | ||
| repartitionTopicMetadata.get(upstreamSourceTopic).numberOfPartitions().get(); | ||
| } | ||
| } else { | ||
| final Integer count = clusterMetadata.partitionCountForTopic(upstreamSourceTopic); | ||
| if (count == null) { | ||
| throw new TaskAssignmentException( | ||
| "No partition count found for source topic " | ||
| + upstreamSourceTopic | ||
| + ", but it should have been." | ||
| ); | ||
| } | ||
| numPartitionsCandidate = count; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if (numPartitionsCandidate != null) { | ||
| if (partitionCount == null || numPartitionsCandidate > partitionCount) { | ||
| partitionCount = numPartitionsCandidate; | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| return partitionCount; | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The usual lying comment. This constructor is not only used in tests.