-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15.4k
KAFKA-8602: Fix bug in stand-by task creation #7008
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from all commits
fd10fad
c6aa91f
5b1739b
256f40c
c3ffcc0
d27aef7
6bae8ac
5ccaf63
55ab731
06749bf
d52c922
ae3290c
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,186 @@ | ||
| /* | ||
| * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more | ||
| * contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with | ||
| * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership. | ||
| * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0 | ||
| * (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with | ||
| * the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at | ||
| * | ||
| * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 | ||
| * | ||
| * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software | ||
| * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, | ||
| * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. | ||
| * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and | ||
| * limitations under the License. | ||
| */ | ||
| package org.apache.kafka.streams.integration; | ||
|
|
||
| import org.apache.kafka.common.serialization.Serdes; | ||
| import org.apache.kafka.streams.KafkaStreams; | ||
| import org.apache.kafka.streams.KafkaStreams.State; | ||
| import org.apache.kafka.streams.KeyValue; | ||
| import org.apache.kafka.streams.StreamsBuilder; | ||
| import org.apache.kafka.streams.StreamsConfig; | ||
| import org.apache.kafka.streams.Topology; | ||
| import org.apache.kafka.streams.integration.utils.EmbeddedKafkaCluster; | ||
| import org.apache.kafka.streams.kstream.Consumed; | ||
| import org.apache.kafka.streams.kstream.Materialized; | ||
| import org.apache.kafka.streams.kstream.Transformer; | ||
| import org.apache.kafka.streams.processor.ProcessorContext; | ||
| import org.apache.kafka.streams.processor.ThreadMetadata; | ||
| import org.apache.kafka.streams.state.KeyValueStore; | ||
| import org.apache.kafka.streams.state.StoreBuilder; | ||
| import org.apache.kafka.streams.state.Stores; | ||
| import org.apache.kafka.test.IntegrationTest; | ||
| import org.apache.kafka.test.TestUtils; | ||
| import org.junit.After; | ||
| import org.junit.BeforeClass; | ||
| import org.junit.ClassRule; | ||
| import org.junit.Test; | ||
| import org.junit.experimental.categories.Category; | ||
|
|
||
| import java.util.Properties; | ||
| import java.util.function.Predicate; | ||
|
|
||
| @Category({IntegrationTest.class}) | ||
| public class StandbyTaskCreationIntegrationTest { | ||
|
|
||
| private static final int NUM_BROKERS = 1; | ||
|
|
||
| @ClassRule | ||
| public static final EmbeddedKafkaCluster CLUSTER = new EmbeddedKafkaCluster(NUM_BROKERS); | ||
|
|
||
| private static final String INPUT_TOPIC = "input-topic"; | ||
|
|
||
| private KafkaStreams client1; | ||
| private KafkaStreams client2; | ||
| private volatile boolean client1IsOk = false; | ||
| private volatile boolean client2IsOk = false; | ||
|
|
||
| @BeforeClass | ||
| public static void createTopics() throws InterruptedException { | ||
| CLUSTER.createTopic(INPUT_TOPIC, 2, 1); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @After | ||
| public void after() { | ||
| client1.close(); | ||
| client2.close(); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| private Properties streamsConfiguration() { | ||
| final String applicationId = "testApp"; | ||
| final Properties streamsConfiguration = new Properties(); | ||
| streamsConfiguration.put(StreamsConfig.APPLICATION_ID_CONFIG, applicationId); | ||
| streamsConfiguration.put(StreamsConfig.BOOTSTRAP_SERVERS_CONFIG, CLUSTER.bootstrapServers()); | ||
| streamsConfiguration.put(StreamsConfig.STATE_DIR_CONFIG, TestUtils.tempDirectory(applicationId).getPath()); | ||
| streamsConfiguration.put(StreamsConfig.DEFAULT_KEY_SERDE_CLASS_CONFIG, Serdes.Integer().getClass()); | ||
| streamsConfiguration.put(StreamsConfig.DEFAULT_VALUE_SERDE_CLASS_CONFIG, Serdes.Integer().getClass()); | ||
| streamsConfiguration.put(StreamsConfig.NUM_STANDBY_REPLICAS_CONFIG, 1); | ||
| return streamsConfiguration; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @Test | ||
| public void shouldNotCreateAnyStandByTasksForStateStoreWithLoggingDisabled() throws Exception { | ||
| final StreamsBuilder builder = new StreamsBuilder(); | ||
| final String stateStoreName = "myTransformState"; | ||
| final StoreBuilder<KeyValueStore<Integer, Integer>> keyValueStoreBuilder = | ||
| Stores.keyValueStoreBuilder(Stores.persistentKeyValueStore(stateStoreName), | ||
| Serdes.Integer(), | ||
| Serdes.Integer()).withLoggingDisabled(); | ||
| builder.addStateStore(keyValueStoreBuilder); | ||
| builder.stream(INPUT_TOPIC, Consumed.with(Serdes.Integer(), Serdes.Integer())) | ||
| .transform(() -> new Transformer<Integer, Integer, KeyValue<Integer, Integer>>() { | ||
| @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") | ||
| @Override | ||
| public void init(final ProcessorContext context) {} | ||
|
|
||
| @Override | ||
| public KeyValue<Integer, Integer> transform(final Integer key, final Integer value) { | ||
| return null; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @Override | ||
| public void close() {} | ||
| }, stateStoreName); | ||
|
|
||
| final Topology topology = builder.build(); | ||
| createClients(topology, streamsConfiguration(), topology, streamsConfiguration()); | ||
|
|
||
| setStateListenersForVerification(thread -> thread.standbyTasks().isEmpty() && !thread.activeTasks().isEmpty()); | ||
|
|
||
| startClients(); | ||
|
|
||
| waitUntilBothClientAreOK( | ||
| "At least one client did not reach state RUNNING with active tasks but no stand-by tasks" | ||
| ); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @Test | ||
| public void shouldCreateStandByTasksForMaterializedAndOptimizedSourceTables() throws Exception { | ||
| final Properties streamsConfiguration1 = streamsConfiguration(); | ||
| streamsConfiguration1.put(StreamsConfig.TOPOLOGY_OPTIMIZATION, StreamsConfig.OPTIMIZE); | ||
| final Properties streamsConfiguration2 = streamsConfiguration(); | ||
| streamsConfiguration2.put(StreamsConfig.TOPOLOGY_OPTIMIZATION, StreamsConfig.OPTIMIZE); | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Probably not that important, but are these two Properties objects exactly the same?
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. No, they are not because of |
||
|
|
||
| final StreamsBuilder builder = new StreamsBuilder(); | ||
| builder.table(INPUT_TOPIC, Consumed.with(Serdes.Integer(), Serdes.Integer()), Materialized.as("source-table")); | ||
|
|
||
| createClients( | ||
| builder.build(streamsConfiguration1), | ||
| streamsConfiguration1, | ||
| builder.build(streamsConfiguration2), | ||
| streamsConfiguration2 | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| setStateListenersForVerification(thread -> !thread.standbyTasks().isEmpty() && !thread.activeTasks().isEmpty()); | ||
|
|
||
| startClients(); | ||
|
|
||
| waitUntilBothClientAreOK( | ||
| "At least one client did not reach state RUNNING with active tasks and stand-by tasks" | ||
| ); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| private void createClients(final Topology topology1, | ||
| final Properties streamsConfiguration1, | ||
| final Topology topology2, | ||
| final Properties streamsConfiguration2) { | ||
|
|
||
| client1 = new KafkaStreams(topology1, streamsConfiguration1); | ||
| client2 = new KafkaStreams(topology2, streamsConfiguration2); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| private void setStateListenersForVerification(final Predicate<ThreadMetadata> taskCondition) { | ||
| client1.setStateListener((newState, oldState) -> { | ||
| if (newState == State.RUNNING && | ||
| client1.localThreadsMetadata().stream().allMatch(taskCondition)) { | ||
|
|
||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. nit: extra line
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I left this extra line on purpose so that it is immediately clear that |
||
| client1IsOk = true; | ||
| } | ||
| }); | ||
| client2.setStateListener((newState, oldState) -> { | ||
| if (newState == State.RUNNING && | ||
| client2.localThreadsMetadata().stream().allMatch(taskCondition)) { | ||
|
|
||
| client2IsOk = true; | ||
| } | ||
| }); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| private void startClients() { | ||
| client1.start(); | ||
| client2.start(); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| private void waitUntilBothClientAreOK(final String message) throws Exception { | ||
| TestUtils.waitForCondition( | ||
| () -> client1IsOk && client2IsOk, | ||
| 30 * 1000, | ||
| message + ": " | ||
| + "Client 1 is " + (!client1IsOk ? "NOT " : "") + "OK, " | ||
| + "client 2 is " + (!client2IsOk ? "NOT " : "") + "OK." | ||
| ); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does this still work for optimized source tables, which read from the input topic instead?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good point. Thinking about this, StandBys for source-KTables might have been broker for a long time already... (maybe since 0.10.0.0???)
Maybe @cadonna can verify? If that is the case, we should split out a separate ticket and PR to fix StandBys for source-KTables independently.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, good point! Added an integration test to verify materialized and optimized source tables.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Cannot follow. You test seem to use the PAPI, and the PAPI does not provide the KTable optimization. You would need to use
StreamBuilder#table()to test the changelog optimization.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
See
StandbyTaskCreationIntegrationTestline 128.