Skip to content

MINOR: rename InternalProcessorContext.initialized - #5672

Merged
mjsax merged 1 commit into
apache:trunkfrom
vvcephei:rename-internal-context-initialized
Sep 21, 2018
Merged

MINOR: rename InternalProcessorContext.initialized#5672
mjsax merged 1 commit into
apache:trunkfrom
vvcephei:rename-internal-context-initialized

Conversation

@vvcephei

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

We named this method initialized because it marks the context as having been initialized.
The downside is that it sounds more like a getter upon casual reading, which is weird since it's void.

Note also that the inverse method is already called uninitialize.

Committer Checklist (excluded from commit message)

  • Verify design and implementation
  • Verify test coverage and CI build status
  • Verify documentation (including upgrade notes)

@vvcephei

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/cc @mjsax @bbejeck

@vvcephei

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Hmm. The java 10 build failed for :core:compileTestScala, claiming there were 4 errors, but I can't find any in the output. I also can't repro the failure on my machine in java 10 or java 8.

Retest this, please.

@bbejeck bbejeck left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for doing this PR. LGTM

@mjsax mjsax left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

@mjsax
mjsax merged commit 96132e2 into apache:trunk Sep 21, 2018
@vvcephei
vvcephei deleted the rename-internal-context-initialized branch September 21, 2018 20:48
pengxiaolong pushed a commit to pengxiaolong/kafka that referenced this pull request Jun 14, 2019
Reviewers: Bill Bejeck <bill@confluent.io>, Matthias J. Sax <matthias@confluent.io>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants