-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15.4k
KAFKA-6955: Use Java AdminClient in DeleteRecordsCommand #5088
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from 4 commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
6e71ca1
KAFKA-6955: Use Java AdminClient in DeleteRecordsCommand
vahidhashemian 3595e1a
Minor update
vahidhashemian b25c8f4
Removed the old method from AdminClient.scala, and updated the unit t…
vahidhashemian 3beab26
Removed the alias for the new AdminClient class
vahidhashemian ce98717
Moved delete records tests to AdminClientIntegrationTest
vahidhashemian 667939c
A few tweaks
ijuma b5d6a55
Remove `()`
ijuma 016200d
Fixed the expected exception unit test
vahidhashemian 28d4e05
Minor tweak
ijuma File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -95,6 +95,7 @@ <h5><a id="upgrade_200_notable" href="#upgrade_200_notable">Notable changes in 2 | |
| timeout behavior for blocking APIs. In particular, a new <code>poll(Duration)</code> API has been added which | ||
| does not block for dynamic partition assignment. The old <code>poll(long)</code> API has been deprecated and | ||
| will be removed in a future version.</li> | ||
| <li>The implementation of DeleteRecordsCommand makes use of the new Java-based AdminClient.</li> | ||
|
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I meant that the note should be about removing |
||
| </ul> | ||
|
|
||
| <h5><a id="upgrade_200_new_protocols" href="#upgrade_200_new_protocols">New Protocol Versions</a></h5> | ||
|
|
||
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we have a test like this in
AdminClientIntegrationTest? If not, we should move it there. If so, we should just remove this test.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I removed the duplicate delete records tests, and moved the non-duplicate ones over.