-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.9k
KAFKA-19851 Delete dynamic config that were removed by Kafka #21053
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
0xffff-zhiyan
wants to merge
16
commits into
apache:trunk
Choose a base branch
from
0xffff-zhiyan:KAFKA-19851
base: trunk
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+297
−15
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
16 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
ef97675
Delete dynamic config that were removed by Kafka
0xffff-zhiyan 1f061a0
fix
0xffff-zhiyan b409bfb
fix
0xffff-zhiyan 2073e58
fix
0xffff-zhiyan 3b76ce3
fix
0xffff-zhiyan 6416107
Merge branch 'trunk' into KAFKA-19851
0xffff-zhiyan ca2e9e1
filter existingConfigsSnapshot
0xffff-zhiyan 53e3690
fix
0xffff-zhiyan 004a6bc
fix
0xffff-zhiyan 1c59b15
fix
0xffff-zhiyan b1b0f3b
fix
0xffff-zhiyan 6d8f850
fix
0xffff-zhiyan af20445
fix
0xffff-zhiyan d8875a0
fix
0xffff-zhiyan 20e6528
fix
0xffff-zhiyan a2ef916
fix format
0xffff-zhiyan File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
so we're ignoring any invalid existing config by removing it from the existingConfigsMap prior to processing it in
validator.validate(configResource, allConfigs, existingConfigsMap);I'm thinking it might work out to just incorporate this logic directly into
ControllerConfigurationValidator#isValidConfigUh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes we can. But
ControllerConfigurationValidatoris initialized inControllerServer.kafka/core/src/main/scala/kafka/server/ControllerServer.scala
Line 248 in e376801
How can we pass it through from
SharedServerall the way down toConfigurationDelta?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
now that isValidConfig() and validate() are methods in the same implementation, you can now have
validate()check forisValidConfig()before verifyingexistingConfigsThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
or, there might be an argument for why we should just avoid throwing errors on existingConfigs when validating alter config requests to begin with. (
ControllerConfigurationValidator#validateis only called when validating alter config requests - we can simply skip checking existingConfigs in that method altogether if folks agree on this)