-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15.4k
KAFKA-3720 : Deprecated BufferExhaustedException and also removed its use and the related sensor metric #1417
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
fb66dcf
Deprecated BufferExhaustedException and also removed its use and the …
MayureshGharat ab879b4
Update the buffer-exhausted-records sensor when a timeoutException is…
MayureshGharat d137aff
Made BufferExhaustException a subclass of TimeoutException
MayureshGharat File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this is gonna be a slight spec change. Before this, a
TimeoutExceptionthrown either by waiting metadata or by waiting buffer allocation were caught by the following clause forApiException(sinceTimeoutExceptionextendsRetriableExceptionwhich is anApiException), so aFutureFailurereturned instead of throwing, and the callback triggered too.As the result of this change, two TimeoutException cases are treated differently:
FutureFailurereturned instead of throwThis sounds confusing and inconsistent. I think we can either take 1. always return
FailureFutureforTimeoutExceptionor 2. always throw for timeout exception.IMO, by design of KafkaProducer(method blocking is part of interface), the latter one makes more sense to me.
WDYT?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is a good point. The current implementation is a bit misleading with regards to the javadoc which states:
We don't actually throw that exception unless you do
Future.get. It seems to me that the change in this PR actually fixes the implementation to match the specified contract.Another option is to change the javadoc to match the implementation (probably less likely to break users) and then we would simply have a check in the
ApiExceptioncatch block to record the metric forBufferExhaustedException. This seems safer.Thoughts?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Right, it's indeed an option which is much safer.
Still I think we better throw here by following reasons:
producer#sendis forced to wait until the result turns out, so the caller should receive the result of that call in a synchronous way.