-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.1k
Spark 3.2: Refactor TestRemoveOrphanFilesAction - remove Thread.sleep() #4711
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
rdblue
merged 1 commit into
apache:master
from
kasasi:spark3.2_refactor_test_remove_orphan_files_action
May 10, 2022
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this will jsut immediately return. The
waitUntilAfterfunction loops while the passed in timestamp is less thanSystem.currentTimeMillis.Other places I see
waitUntilAfterused tend to wait untiltable.currentSnapshot.timestampMillis(). But in this file it does seem that this is howwaitUntilAfteris used, so I'm ok with this.If we notice this being flakey, then we might want to change it to using the table's current snapshot timestamp instead.