-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3k
Parquet: Implement Variant readers #12139
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
12 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
72cb155
Parquet: Implement Variant readers.
rdblue 8f3c5ee
Handle missing value column with shredded object fields.
rdblue ca1ac1a
Apply spotless.
rdblue 79df73c
Fix incorrect imports.
rdblue 7a29063
Fix checkstyle.
rdblue 3a056d2
Fix checkstyle in tests.
rdblue 927808a
Apply spotless.
rdblue 7ece5b4
Update for rebase after #12167.
rdblue aac9823
Update DL -> DefinitionLevel
rdblue b1a2645
Fix value and typed_value conflict.
rdblue a6e9a93
Clean up now that core changes from #11831 are in.
rdblue d752b89
Remove unnecessary qualifier.
rdblue File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ | |
| import org.apache.iceberg.relocated.com.google.common.collect.Sets; | ||
| import org.apache.iceberg.types.TypeUtil; | ||
| import org.apache.iceberg.types.Types; | ||
| import org.apache.parquet.io.InvalidRecordException; | ||
| import org.apache.parquet.schema.GroupType; | ||
| import org.apache.parquet.schema.MessageType; | ||
| import org.apache.parquet.schema.PrimitiveType; | ||
|
|
@@ -75,6 +76,32 @@ private static Schema convertInternal( | |
| converter.getAliases()); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| /** | ||
| * Returns true if the name identifies a field in the struct/group. | ||
| * | ||
| * @param group a GroupType | ||
| * @param name a String name | ||
| * @return true if the group contains a field with the given name | ||
| */ | ||
| public static boolean hasField(GroupType group, String name) { | ||
|
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. New helper methods for working with Parquet fields. |
||
| return fieldType(group, name) != null; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| /** | ||
| * Returns the Type of the named field in the struct/group, or null. | ||
| * | ||
| * @param group a GroupType | ||
| * @param name a String name | ||
| * @return the Type of the field in the group, or null if it is not present. | ||
| */ | ||
| public static Type fieldType(GroupType group, String name) { | ||
| try { | ||
| return group.getType(name); | ||
| } catch (InvalidRecordException ignored) { | ||
| return null; | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| public static MessageType pruneColumns(MessageType fileSchema, Schema expectedSchema) { | ||
| // column order must match the incoming type, so it doesn't matter that the ids are unordered | ||
| Set<Integer> selectedIds = TypeUtil.getProjectedIds(expectedSchema); | ||
|
|
||
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Needed to expose these to create test values in the Parquet package.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it would be fine to expose it here, but it we could also add some builders in the test module if we want to not have as much exposure. So TestParquet depends on TestCore and core has public builders for Variants.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think that we're going to want these in order to be able to construct variants anyway, so I'm inclined to leave them as public, at least in core.