chore: expose field id mapping from schema #1498
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
jdcasale
pushed a commit
to jdcasale/iceberg-rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 28, 2025
## What changes are included in this PR? Motivation: - I would like to leverage naming mapping, to compensate the issue that table metadata reassigns field id on creation. - Name mapping requires (1) field id; (2) field name; (3) children values; all these information could be fetched from `Schema`, but could be a lot easier and performant if we could expose (1) field id -> field name; (2) field id -> field mapping. ## Are these changes tested? N/A, trivial visibility change, no functional change
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes are included in this PR?
Motivation:
Schema, but could be a lot easier and performant if we could expose (1) field id -> field name; (2) field id -> field mapping.Are these changes tested?
N/A, trivial visibility change, no functional change