-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.5k
[HUDI-2016] Fixed bootstrap of Metadata Table when some actions are in progress. #3083
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
vinothchandar
merged 1 commit into
apache:master
from
prashantwason:pw_HUDI_2016_fix_bootstrap_during_inflight
Jul 6, 2021
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
would we remove calling
syncTableMetadata()inSparkRDDWriteClient#preWrite? since it will do nothing as there are in progress instant always.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In the bootstrap path this will do nothing. But in the normal path (post bootstrap), this path also syncs the metadata table.
The metadata table sync is indepdendant of the dataset commits. So its possible that the dataset commit may have completed and metadata table sync failed (due to some error or crash) in postWrite. So calling the sync again in preWrite ensures we sync again.
@vinothchandar Do you think the sync in preWrite can be removed as an optimization?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As @prashantwason mentioned, its actually kind of important that we do that in preWrite() so we bring the metadata table in sync with the timeline, before writes happen. So not sure if it can be removed.
We are moving towards a synchronous design anyway, for updating metadata, so lets may be revisit in that context?