Skip to content

[HUDI-1143] Change timestamp field in HoodieTestDataGenerator from double to long#2071

Merged
n3nash merged 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
shenh062326:HUDI-1143
Sep 16, 2020
Merged

[HUDI-1143] Change timestamp field in HoodieTestDataGenerator from double to long#2071
n3nash merged 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
shenh062326:HUDI-1143

Conversation

@shenh062326
Copy link
Contributor

What is the purpose of the pull request

(For example: This pull request adds quick-start document.)

Brief change log

(for example:)

  • Modify AnnotationLocation checkstyle rule in checkstyle.xml

Verify this pull request

(Please pick either of the following options)

This pull request is a trivial rework / code cleanup without any test coverage.

(or)

This pull request is already covered by existing tests, such as (please describe tests).

(or)

This change added tests and can be verified as follows:

(example:)

  • Added integration tests for end-to-end.
  • Added HoodieClientWriteTest to verify the change.
  • Manually verified the change by running a job locally.

Committer checklist

  • Has a corresponding JIRA in PR title & commit

  • Commit message is descriptive of the change

  • CI is green

  • Necessary doc changes done or have another open PR

  • For large changes, please consider breaking it into sub-tasks under an umbrella JIRA.

@shenh062326
Copy link
Contributor Author

@n3nash can you take a look at this MR.

@n3nash
Copy link
Contributor

n3nash commented Sep 11, 2020

@shenh062326 The PR looks fine to me, high level, what is the reason for this change ? Is it just to correct timestamp types ?

@shenh062326
Copy link
Contributor Author

@shenh062326 The PR looks fine to me, high level, what is the reason for this change ? Is it just to correct timestamp types ?

The Description in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-1143 explain the reason:
"In order to help TestBootstrap succeed, had to turn the field into a regular long. We need to fix this correctly "

@n3nash
Copy link
Contributor

n3nash commented Sep 16, 2020

@shenh062326 thanks for explaining.

@n3nash n3nash self-requested a review September 16, 2020 03:58
Copy link
Contributor

@n3nash n3nash left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants