-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
HIVE-28727: Iceberg: Refactor IcebergTableUtil.toPartitionData #5622
Conversation
31896b5
to
97772fc
Compare
fc37361
to
dd1c930
Compare
{"company_id":100,"dept_id":1,"team_id":null} 1 0 3 | ||
{"company_id":100,"dept_id":2,"team_id":null} 1 0 3 | ||
{"company_id":null,"dept_id":null,"team_id":null} 1 0 1 | ||
{"company_id":null,"dept_id":null,"team_id":null} 1 0 2 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I wonder why two {"company_id":null,"dept_id":null,"team_id":null}
remain. I think it is minor and out of scope of HIVE-28727
@difin Could you please have a look? You are one of the most familiar engineers with Apache Icebergs' compaction. |
iceberg/iceberg-handler/src/main/java/org/apache/iceberg/mr/hive/IcebergTableUtil.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
dd1c930
to
3876695
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
+1, pending green build
thx @okumin!
|
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Clean up our Iceberg utilities.
Why are the changes needed?
For clean up + add some regression tests.
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
Is the change a dependency upgrade?
No.
How was this patch tested?
I updated an existing qtest.