HDFS-16872 [WIP - DEMO ONLY] Concurrent support for LogThrottlingHelper

[xkrogen]

WIP PR for demonstration purposes only while working through #5246

[hadoop-yetus]

💔 -1 overall

Vote	Subsystem	Runtime	Logfile	Comment
+0 🆗	reexec	0m 38s		Docker mode activated.
			_ Prechecks _
+1 💚	dupname	0m 0s		No case conflicting files found.
+0 🆗	codespell	0m 1s		codespell was not available.
+0 🆗	detsecrets	0m 1s		detect-secrets was not available.
+1 💚	@author	0m 0s		The patch does not contain any @author tags.
-1 ❌	test4tests	0m 0s		The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch.
			_ trunk Compile Tests _
+1 💚	mvninstall	41m 51s		trunk passed
+1 💚	compile	24m 35s		trunk passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.17+8-post-Ubuntu-1ubuntu220.04
+1 💚	compile	22m 11s		trunk passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_352-8u352-ga-1~20.04-b08
+1 💚	checkstyle	1m 5s		trunk passed
+1 💚	mvnsite	1m 39s		trunk passed
-1 ❌	javadoc	1m 11s	/branch-javadoc-hadoop-common-project_hadoop-common-jdkUbuntu-11.0.17+8-post-Ubuntu-1ubuntu220.04.txt	hadoop-common in trunk failed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.17+8-post-Ubuntu-1ubuntu220.04.
+1 💚	javadoc	0m 42s		trunk passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_352-8u352-ga-1~20.04-b08
+1 💚	spotbugs	2m 45s		trunk passed
+1 💚	shadedclient	23m 40s		branch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
			_ Patch Compile Tests _
+1 💚	mvninstall	1m 0s		the patch passed
+1 💚	compile	24m 32s		the patch passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.17+8-post-Ubuntu-1ubuntu220.04
+1 💚	javac	24m 32s		the patch passed
+1 💚	compile	20m 58s		the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_352-8u352-ga-1~20.04-b08
+1 💚	javac	20m 58s		the patch passed
+1 💚	blanks	0m 0s		The patch has no blanks issues.
-0 ⚠️	checkstyle	0m 58s	/results-checkstyle-hadoop-common-project_hadoop-common.txt	hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common: The patch generated 1 new + 0 unchanged - 0 fixed = 1 total (was 0)
+1 💚	mvnsite	1m 39s		the patch passed
-1 ❌	javadoc	1m 5s	/patch-javadoc-hadoop-common-project_hadoop-common-jdkUbuntu-11.0.17+8-post-Ubuntu-1ubuntu220.04.txt	hadoop-common in the patch failed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.17+8-post-Ubuntu-1ubuntu220.04.
+1 💚	javadoc	0m 47s		the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_352-8u352-ga-1~20.04-b08
+1 💚	spotbugs	2m 40s		the patch passed
+1 💚	shadedclient	23m 30s		patch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
			_ Other Tests _
+1 💚	unit	18m 14s		hadoop-common in the patch passed.
+1 💚	asflicense	1m 3s		The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
		216m 29s

Subsystem	Report/Notes
Docker	ClientAPI=1.41 ServerAPI=1.41 base: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-5269/1/artifact/out/Dockerfile
GITHUB PR	#5269
Optional Tests	dupname asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall mvnsite unit shadedclient spotbugs checkstyle codespell detsecrets
uname	Linux e4d5f5b01f11 4.15.0-200-generic #211-Ubuntu SMP Thu Nov 24 18:16:04 UTC 2022 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Build tool	maven
Personality	dev-support/bin/hadoop.sh
git revision	trunk / 3c20c81
Default Java	Private Build-1.8.0_352-8u352-ga-1~20.04-b08
Multi-JDK versions	/usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64:Ubuntu-11.0.17+8-post-Ubuntu-1ubuntu220.04 /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64:Private Build-1.8.0_352-8u352-ga-1~20.04-b08
Test Results	https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-5269/1/testReport/
Max. process+thread count	1291 (vs. ulimit of 5500)
modules	C: hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common U: hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common
Console output	https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-5269/1/console
versions	git=2.25.1 maven=3.6.3 spotbugs=4.2.2
Powered by	Apache Yetus 0.14.0 https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

[github-actions]

We're closing this stale PR because it has been open for 100 days with no activity. This isn't a judgement on the merit of the PR in any way. It's just a way of keeping the PR queue manageable.
If you feel like this was a mistake, or you would like to continue working on it, please feel free to re-open it and ask for a committer to remove the stale tag and review again.
Thanks all for your contribution.