YARN-11111. Recovery failure when node-label configure-type transit f…

[zuston]

…rom delegated-centralized to centralized

Description of PR

How was this patch tested?

For code changes:

• Does the title or this PR starts with the corresponding JIRA issue id (e.g. 'HADOOP-17799. Your PR title ...')?
• Object storage: have the integration tests been executed and the endpoint declared according to the connector-specific documentation?
• If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under ASF 2.0?
• If applicable, have you updated the LICENSE, LICENSE-binary, NOTICE-binary files?

[zuston]

@9uapaw @brumi1024 If u have time, could u help review it? Thanks

[hadoop-yetus]

💔 -1 overall

Vote	Subsystem	Runtime	Logfile	Comment
+0 🆗	reexec	0m 58s		Docker mode activated.
			_ Prechecks _
+1 💚	dupname	0m 0s		No case conflicting files found.
+0 🆗	codespell	0m 0s		codespell was not available.
+1 💚	@author	0m 0s		The patch does not contain any @author tags.
-1 ❌	test4tests	0m 0s		The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch.
			_ trunk Compile Tests _
+1 💚	mvninstall	38m 46s		trunk passed
+1 💚	compile	1m 6s		trunk passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.14.1+1-Ubuntu-0ubuntu1.20.04
+1 💚	compile	1m 2s		trunk passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_312-8u312-b07-0ubuntu1~20.04-b07
+1 💚	checkstyle	0m 57s		trunk passed
+1 💚	mvnsite	1m 6s		trunk passed
+1 💚	javadoc	1m 10s		trunk passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.14.1+1-Ubuntu-0ubuntu1.20.04
+1 💚	javadoc	1m 4s		trunk passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_312-8u312-b07-0ubuntu1~20.04-b07
+1 💚	spotbugs	2m 9s		trunk passed
+1 💚	shadedclient	21m 45s		branch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
			_ Patch Compile Tests _
+1 💚	mvninstall	0m 44s		the patch passed
+1 💚	compile	0m 47s		the patch passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.14.1+1-Ubuntu-0ubuntu1.20.04
+1 💚	javac	0m 47s		the patch passed
+1 💚	compile	0m 44s		the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_312-8u312-b07-0ubuntu1~20.04-b07
+1 💚	javac	0m 44s		the patch passed
+1 💚	blanks	0m 0s		The patch has no blanks issues.
+1 💚	checkstyle	0m 33s		the patch passed
+1 💚	mvnsite	0m 46s		the patch passed
+1 💚	javadoc	0m 46s		the patch passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.14.1+1-Ubuntu-0ubuntu1.20.04
+1 💚	javadoc	0m 45s		the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_312-8u312-b07-0ubuntu1~20.04-b07
+1 💚	spotbugs	1m 47s		the patch passed
+1 💚	shadedclient	21m 4s		patch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
			_ Other Tests _
+1 💚	unit	4m 56s		hadoop-yarn-common in the patch passed.
+1 💚	asflicense	0m 51s		The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
		103m 57s

Subsystem	Report/Notes
Docker	ClientAPI=1.41 ServerAPI=1.41 base: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-4200/1/artifact/out/Dockerfile
GITHUB PR	#4200
Optional Tests	dupname asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall mvnsite unit shadedclient spotbugs checkstyle codespell
uname	Linux bbd52a413ec1 4.15.0-65-generic #74-Ubuntu SMP Tue Sep 17 17:06:04 UTC 2019 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Build tool	maven
Personality	dev-support/bin/hadoop.sh
git revision	trunk / 9b94674
Default Java	Private Build-1.8.0_312-8u312-b07-0ubuntu1~20.04-b07
Multi-JDK versions	/usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64:Ubuntu-11.0.14.1+1-Ubuntu-0ubuntu1.20.04 /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64:Private Build-1.8.0_312-8u312-b07-0ubuntu1~20.04-b07
Test Results	https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-4200/1/testReport/
Max. process+thread count	662 (vs. ulimit of 5500)
modules	C: hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-common U: hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-common
Console output	https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-4200/1/console
versions	git=2.25.1 maven=3.6.3 spotbugs=4.2.2
Powered by	Apache Yetus 0.14.0-SNAPSHOT https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

[dineshchitlangia]

+1 LGTM

[brumi1024]

LGTM from my side as well.

@dineshchitlangia do you plan to merge this, or should I?

[dineshchitlangia]

+1 Thanks @zuston for the change and @brumi1024 for the review.

[zuston]

Thanks @dineshchitlangia @brumi1024.