HADOOP-17971. Exclude IBM Java security classes from being shaded/relocated.

[n-marion]

Description of PR

Exclude IBM Java security classes located in com.ibm.security* from being shaded.

How was this patch tested?

Manual injection of UserGroupInformation class files (which contain references to com.ibm.security classes) that were compiled manually.

I followed bug fixes for similar issues. IBM java isn't actually used in source code except being referenced when it is the running JVM.

[hadoop-yetus]

💔 -1 overall

Vote	Subsystem	Runtime	Logfile	Comment
+0 🆗	reexec	12m 11s		Docker mode activated.
			_ Prechecks _
+1 💚	dupname	0m 0s		No case conflicting files found.
+0 🆗	codespell	0m 1s		codespell was not available.
+1 💚	@author	0m 0s		The patch does not contain any @author tags.
-1 ❌	test4tests	0m 0s		The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch.
			_ trunk Compile Tests _
+0 🆗	mvndep	12m 48s		Maven dependency ordering for branch
+1 💚	mvninstall	20m 59s		trunk passed
+1 💚	compile	0m 24s		trunk passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.11+9-Ubuntu-0ubuntu2.20.04
+1 💚	compile	0m 25s		trunk passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_292-8u292-b10-0ubuntu1~20.04-b10
+1 💚	mvnsite	1m 18s		trunk passed
+1 💚	javadoc	1m 12s		trunk passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.11+9-Ubuntu-0ubuntu2.20.04
+1 💚	javadoc	1m 12s		trunk passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_292-8u292-b10-0ubuntu1~20.04-b10
+1 💚	shadedclient	56m 42s		branch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
-0 ⚠️	patch	57m 1s		Used diff version of patch file. Binary files and potentially other changes not applied. Please rebase and squash commits if necessary.
			_ Patch Compile Tests _
+0 🆗	mvndep	0m 28s		Maven dependency ordering for patch
+1 💚	mvninstall	9m 57s		the patch passed
+1 💚	compile	0m 15s		the patch passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.11+9-Ubuntu-0ubuntu2.20.04
+1 💚	javac	0m 15s		the patch passed
+1 💚	compile	0m 16s		the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_292-8u292-b10-0ubuntu1~20.04-b10
+1 💚	javac	0m 16s		the patch passed
+1 💚	blanks	0m 0s		The patch has no blanks issues.
+1 💚	mvnsite	0m 49s		the patch passed
+1 💚	xml	0m 4s		The patch has no ill-formed XML file.
+1 💚	javadoc	0m 46s		the patch passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.11+9-Ubuntu-0ubuntu2.20.04
+1 💚	javadoc	0m 45s		the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_292-8u292-b10-0ubuntu1~20.04-b10
+1 💚	shadedclient	20m 26s		patch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
			_ Other Tests _
+1 💚	unit	0m 19s		hadoop-client-api in the patch passed.
+1 💚	unit	0m 19s		hadoop-client-runtime in the patch passed.
+1 💚	unit	0m 19s		hadoop-client-minicluster in the patch passed.
+1 💚	asflicense	0m 35s		The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
		104m 10s

Subsystem	Report/Notes
Docker	ClientAPI=1.41 ServerAPI=1.41 base: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-3567/1/artifact/out/Dockerfile
GITHUB PR	#3567
Optional Tests	dupname asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall mvnsite unit shadedclient codespell xml
uname	Linux 650fc9995833 4.15.0-58-generic #64-Ubuntu SMP Tue Aug 6 11:12:41 UTC 2019 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Build tool	maven
Personality	dev-support/bin/hadoop.sh
git revision	trunk / 2133274
Default Java	Private Build-1.8.0_292-8u292-b10-0ubuntu1~20.04-b10
Multi-JDK versions	/usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64:Ubuntu-11.0.11+9-Ubuntu-0ubuntu2.20.04 /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64:Private Build-1.8.0_292-8u292-b10-0ubuntu1~20.04-b10
Test Results	https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-3567/1/testReport/
Max. process+thread count	661 (vs. ulimit of 5500)
modules	C: hadoop-client-modules/hadoop-client-api hadoop-client-modules/hadoop-client-runtime hadoop-client-modules/hadoop-client-minicluster U: hadoop-client-modules
Console output	https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-3567/1/console
versions	git=2.25.1 maven=3.6.3
Powered by	Apache Yetus 0.14.0-SNAPSHOT https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

[aajisaka]

+1. I haven't tested with IBM Java, however, given com.sun.security.* packages are excluded, com.ibm.security.* packages should be excluded as well. Thank you @n-marion