HDFS-16279. Print detail datanode info when process first storage report by tomscut · Pull Request #3564 · apache/hadoop

tomscut · 2021-10-19T12:41:42Z

Print detail datanode info when process first storage report.

hadoop-yetus · 2021-10-19T20:10:50Z

💔 -1 overall

Vote	Subsystem	Runtime	Logfile	Comment
+0 🆗	reexec	16m 49s		Docker mode activated.
			_ Prechecks _
+1 💚	dupname	0m 0s		No case conflicting files found.
+0 🆗	codespell	0m 0s		codespell was not available.
+1 💚	@author	0m 0s		The patch does not contain any @author tags.
-1 ❌	test4tests	0m 0s		The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch.
			_ trunk Compile Tests _
+1 💚	mvninstall	34m 3s		trunk passed
+1 💚	compile	1m 21s		trunk passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.11+9-Ubuntu-0ubuntu2.20.04
+1 💚	compile	1m 13s		trunk passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_292-8u292-b10-0ubuntu1~20.04-b10
+1 💚	checkstyle	1m 0s		trunk passed
+1 💚	mvnsite	1m 22s		trunk passed
+1 💚	javadoc	0m 55s		trunk passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.11+9-Ubuntu-0ubuntu2.20.04
+1 💚	javadoc	1m 27s		trunk passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_292-8u292-b10-0ubuntu1~20.04-b10
+1 💚	spotbugs	3m 18s		trunk passed
+1 💚	shadedclient	24m 17s		branch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
			_ Patch Compile Tests _
+1 💚	mvninstall	1m 13s		the patch passed
+1 💚	compile	1m 19s		the patch passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.11+9-Ubuntu-0ubuntu2.20.04
+1 💚	javac	1m 19s		the patch passed
+1 💚	compile	1m 7s		the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_292-8u292-b10-0ubuntu1~20.04-b10
+1 💚	javac	1m 7s		the patch passed
+1 💚	blanks	0m 0s		The patch has no blanks issues.
+1 💚	checkstyle	0m 52s		the patch passed
+1 💚	mvnsite	1m 15s		the patch passed
+1 💚	javadoc	0m 48s		the patch passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.11+9-Ubuntu-0ubuntu2.20.04
+1 💚	javadoc	1m 20s		the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_292-8u292-b10-0ubuntu1~20.04-b10
+1 💚	spotbugs	3m 22s		the patch passed
+1 💚	shadedclient	23m 56s		patch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
			_ Other Tests _
+1 💚	unit	328m 49s		hadoop-hdfs in the patch passed.
+1 💚	asflicense	0m 37s		The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
		447m 46s

Subsystem	Report/Notes
Docker	ClientAPI=1.41 ServerAPI=1.41 base: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-3564/1/artifact/out/Dockerfile
GITHUB PR	#3564
Optional Tests	dupname asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall mvnsite unit shadedclient spotbugs checkstyle codespell
uname	Linux c253f97aba3e 4.15.0-143-generic #147-Ubuntu SMP Wed Apr 14 16:10:11 UTC 2021 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Build tool	maven
Personality	dev-support/bin/hadoop.sh
git revision	trunk / `7cf5b29`
Default Java	Private Build-1.8.0_292-8u292-b10-0ubuntu1~20.04-b10
Multi-JDK versions	/usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64:Ubuntu-11.0.11+9-Ubuntu-0ubuntu2.20.04 /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64:Private Build-1.8.0_292-8u292-b10-0ubuntu1~20.04-b10
Test Results	https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-3564/1/testReport/
Max. process+thread count	2024 (vs. ulimit of 5500)
modules	C: hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs U: hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs
Console output	https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-3564/1/console
versions	git=2.25.1 maven=3.6.3 spotbugs=4.2.2
Powered by	Apache Yetus 0.14.0-SNAPSHOT https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

tomscut · 2021-10-20T03:14:05Z

Hi @ayushtkn @tasanuma @aajisaka @ferhui , please help review this simple modification. Thanks.

aajisaka · 2021-10-20T07:29:21Z

My understanding is that the change is to print <datanode IP addr>:<port> instead of the UUID of the datanode. I think it is a good change because the UUID is rarely used in troubleshooting. How about printing the hostname instead of the IP address?

tomscut · 2021-10-20T07:37:53Z

My understanding is that the change is to print <datanode IP addr>:<port> instead of the UUID of the datanode. I think it is a good change because the UUID is rarely used in troubleshooting. How about printing the hostname instead of the IP address?

Thanks for your good suggestion. Hostname is a better choice. I will change it to nodeID.getXferAddrWithHostname().

hadoop-yetus · 2021-10-20T15:28:55Z

💔 -1 overall

Vote	Subsystem	Runtime	Logfile	Comment
+0 🆗	reexec	1m 12s		Docker mode activated.
			_ Prechecks _
+1 💚	dupname	0m 0s		No case conflicting files found.
+0 🆗	codespell	0m 0s		codespell was not available.
+1 💚	@author	0m 0s		The patch does not contain any @author tags.
-1 ❌	test4tests	0m 0s		The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch.
			_ trunk Compile Tests _
+1 💚	mvninstall	40m 18s		trunk passed
+1 💚	compile	1m 47s		trunk passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.11+9-Ubuntu-0ubuntu2.20.04
+1 💚	compile	1m 35s		trunk passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_292-8u292-b10-0ubuntu1~20.04-b10
+1 💚	checkstyle	1m 11s		trunk passed
+1 💚	mvnsite	1m 48s		trunk passed
+1 💚	javadoc	1m 16s		trunk passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.11+9-Ubuntu-0ubuntu2.20.04
+1 💚	javadoc	1m 47s		trunk passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_292-8u292-b10-0ubuntu1~20.04-b10
+1 💚	spotbugs	4m 6s		trunk passed
+1 💚	shadedclient	29m 11s		branch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
			_ Patch Compile Tests _
+1 💚	mvninstall	1m 32s		the patch passed
+1 💚	compile	1m 39s		the patch passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.11+9-Ubuntu-0ubuntu2.20.04
+1 💚	javac	1m 39s		the patch passed
+1 💚	compile	1m 28s		the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_292-8u292-b10-0ubuntu1~20.04-b10
+1 💚	javac	1m 28s		the patch passed
+1 💚	blanks	0m 0s		The patch has no blanks issues.
+1 💚	checkstyle	1m 3s		the patch passed
+1 💚	mvnsite	1m 31s		the patch passed
+1 💚	javadoc	1m 2s		the patch passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.11+9-Ubuntu-0ubuntu2.20.04
+1 💚	javadoc	1m 36s		the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_292-8u292-b10-0ubuntu1~20.04-b10
+1 💚	spotbugs	4m 14s		the patch passed
+1 💚	shadedclient	30m 4s		patch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
			_ Other Tests _
-1 ❌	unit	332m 32s	/patch-unit-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs.txt	hadoop-hdfs in the patch passed.
+1 💚	asflicense	0m 36s		The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
		457m 48s

Reason	Tests
Failed junit tests	hadoop.fs.viewfs.TestViewFSOverloadSchemeWithMountTableConfigInHDFS

Subsystem	Report/Notes
Docker	ClientAPI=1.41 ServerAPI=1.41 base: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-3564/2/artifact/out/Dockerfile
GITHUB PR	#3564
Optional Tests	dupname asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall mvnsite unit shadedclient spotbugs checkstyle codespell
uname	Linux 14cb9dfb71a2 4.15.0-143-generic #147-Ubuntu SMP Wed Apr 14 16:10:11 UTC 2021 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Build tool	maven
Personality	dev-support/bin/hadoop.sh
git revision	trunk / `9ea2416`
Default Java	Private Build-1.8.0_292-8u292-b10-0ubuntu1~20.04-b10
Multi-JDK versions	/usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64:Ubuntu-11.0.11+9-Ubuntu-0ubuntu2.20.04 /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64:Private Build-1.8.0_292-8u292-b10-0ubuntu1~20.04-b10
Test Results	https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-3564/2/testReport/
Max. process+thread count	1910 (vs. ulimit of 5500)
modules	C: hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs U: hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs
Console output	https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-3564/2/console
versions	git=2.25.1 maven=3.6.3 spotbugs=4.2.2
Powered by	Apache Yetus 0.14.0-SNAPSHOT https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

tomscut · 2021-10-22T11:10:12Z

Hi @aajisaka , please take a look at this. Thank you.

tomscut · 2021-10-26T05:14:50Z

Hi @jojochuang @ayushtkn @tasanuma , could you please take a look at this. Thanks.

ferhui · 2021-10-26T07:00:53Z

@tomscut I think you miss the following line. Please take a look.

hadoop/hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/server/blockmanagement/BlockManager.java

Line 4268 in 9ea2416

+ " is received from dead or unregistered node {}", nodeID);

tomscut · 2021-10-26T11:06:52Z

@tomscut I think you miss the following line. Please take a look.

hadoop/hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/server/blockmanagement/BlockManager.java

Line 4268 in 9ea2416

+ " is received from dead or unregistered node {}", nodeID);

Thanks @ferhui for reminding me. I fixed it.

tasanuma · 2021-10-26T16:40:26Z

DatanodeID object has a lot of information. This change seems to reduce it.

Before:

java.io.IOException: ProcessReport from dead or unregistered node: DatanodeRegistration(127.0.0.1:60414, datanodeUuid=08d6a9ae-936b-44cc-8151-b10f3ecb0639, infoPort=60416, infoSecurePort=0, ipcPort=60417, storageInfo=lv=-57;cid=testClusterID;nsid=97526889;c=1635265757992)

After:

java.io.IOException: ProcessReport from dead or unregistered node: 127.0.0.1:60435

hadoop-yetus · 2021-10-26T18:36:55Z

💔 -1 overall

Vote	Subsystem	Runtime	Logfile	Comment
+0 🆗	reexec	1m 12s		Docker mode activated.
			_ Prechecks _
+1 💚	dupname	0m 0s		No case conflicting files found.
+0 🆗	codespell	0m 1s		codespell was not available.
+1 💚	@author	0m 0s		The patch does not contain any @author tags.
-1 ❌	test4tests	0m 0s		The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch.
			_ trunk Compile Tests _
+1 💚	mvninstall	38m 6s		trunk passed
+1 💚	compile	1m 44s		trunk passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.11+9-Ubuntu-0ubuntu2.20.04
+1 💚	compile	1m 27s		trunk passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_292-8u292-b10-0ubuntu1~20.04-b10
+1 💚	checkstyle	1m 7s		trunk passed
+1 💚	mvnsite	1m 35s		trunk passed
+1 💚	javadoc	1m 10s		trunk passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.11+9-Ubuntu-0ubuntu2.20.04
+1 💚	javadoc	1m 44s		trunk passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_292-8u292-b10-0ubuntu1~20.04-b10
+1 💚	spotbugs	3m 40s		trunk passed
+1 💚	shadedclient	28m 41s		branch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
			_ Patch Compile Tests _
+1 💚	mvninstall	1m 28s		the patch passed
+1 💚	compile	1m 36s		the patch passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.11+9-Ubuntu-0ubuntu2.20.04
+1 💚	javac	1m 36s		the patch passed
+1 💚	compile	1m 24s		the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_292-8u292-b10-0ubuntu1~20.04-b10
+1 💚	javac	1m 24s		the patch passed
+1 💚	blanks	0m 0s		The patch has no blanks issues.
+1 💚	checkstyle	1m 1s		the patch passed
+1 💚	mvnsite	2m 2s		the patch passed
+1 💚	javadoc	1m 0s		the patch passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.11+9-Ubuntu-0ubuntu2.20.04
+1 💚	javadoc	1m 29s		the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_292-8u292-b10-0ubuntu1~20.04-b10
+1 💚	spotbugs	4m 1s		the patch passed
+1 💚	shadedclient	28m 28s		patch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
			_ Other Tests _
+1 💚	unit	328m 21s		hadoop-hdfs in the patch passed.
+1 💚	asflicense	0m 39s		The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
		449m 18s

Subsystem	Report/Notes
Docker	ClientAPI=1.41 ServerAPI=1.41 base: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-3564/3/artifact/out/Dockerfile
GITHUB PR	#3564
Optional Tests	dupname asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall mvnsite unit shadedclient spotbugs checkstyle codespell
uname	Linux b73d01a6e6e3 4.15.0-143-generic #147-Ubuntu SMP Wed Apr 14 16:10:11 UTC 2021 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Build tool	maven
Personality	dev-support/bin/hadoop.sh
git revision	trunk / `a63addc`
Default Java	Private Build-1.8.0_292-8u292-b10-0ubuntu1~20.04-b10
Multi-JDK versions	/usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64:Ubuntu-11.0.11+9-Ubuntu-0ubuntu2.20.04 /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64:Private Build-1.8.0_292-8u292-b10-0ubuntu1~20.04-b10
Test Results	https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-3564/3/testReport/
Max. process+thread count	1973 (vs. ulimit of 5500)
modules	C: hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs U: hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs
Console output	https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-3564/3/console
versions	git=2.25.1 maven=3.6.3 spotbugs=4.2.2
Powered by	Apache Yetus 0.14.0-SNAPSHOT https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

tomscut · 2021-10-27T01:51:24Z

ProcessReport from dead or unregistered node

Thanks @tasanuma for your comment and pointing out this issue.

When the instantiation of DatanodeID is DatanodeRegistration, it overrides toString(), so the output is a lot, but the address is IP:port.

When the nodeID instantiation object is a DatanodeDescriptor, it doesn't override the toString() method, so the output is very little, just the address IP:port.

I intended to print hostname:port as @aajisaka suggested. But there's something wrong with my implementation. I'll leave the DN address format as it was: IP:port (because changing the toString() of the datanodeID or DatanodeRegistration might cause other compatibility issues). What do you think of this way? Thank you.

tasanuma · 2021-10-27T07:00:34Z

@tomscut Thanks for the explanation. When nodeID is DatanodeRegistration (I think it is most likely case), DatanodeRegistration#toString() is most informative.

nodeID.getDatanodeUuid():

BLOCK* processReport 0x51eb6427619ccf8f: Processing first storage report for DS-ced48a3c-7e37-4a94-9cf9-404e07e659a7 from datanode a7a8fd2f-e0cd-40a4-8fcd-65760b6bc6e6

nodeID.getXferAddrWithHostname():

BLOCK* processReport 0x5006fb6a4251db51: Processing first storage report for DS-ced48a3c-7e37-4a94-9cf9-404e07e659a7 from datanode hostname:11001

nodeID:

BLOCK* processReport 0xe518c3bd634f15e6: Processing first storage report for DS-0048bf1d-84da-444c-8c3f-251dab39f1dc from datanode DatanodeRegistration(127.0.0.1:11000, datanodeUuid=64886279-5799-47a6-96ba-653e3675e816, infoPort=11020, infoSecurePort=0, ipcPort=11010, storageInfo=lv=-57;cid=CID-130467d5-c200-4869-9330-d9eedf4f3909;nsid=930729152;c=1635316881247)

So just using nodeID looks good to me.

because changing the toString() of the datanodeID or DatanodeRegistration might cause other compatibility issues.

I agreed. Let's keep it as it was.

tasanuma

+1, pending Jenkins.

tomscut · 2021-10-27T07:07:02Z

+1, pending Jenkins.

Thanks @tasanuma for your review and comments.

hadoop-yetus · 2021-10-27T09:08:30Z

💔 -1 overall

Vote	Subsystem	Runtime	Logfile	Comment
+0 🆗	reexec	0m 51s		Docker mode activated.
			_ Prechecks _
+1 💚	dupname	0m 0s		No case conflicting files found.
+0 🆗	codespell	0m 0s		codespell was not available.
+1 💚	@author	0m 0s		The patch does not contain any @author tags.
-1 ❌	test4tests	0m 0s		The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch.
			_ trunk Compile Tests _
+1 💚	mvninstall	34m 47s		trunk passed
+1 💚	compile	1m 22s		trunk passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.11+9-Ubuntu-0ubuntu2.20.04
+1 💚	compile	1m 13s		trunk passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_292-8u292-b10-0ubuntu1~20.04-b10
+1 💚	checkstyle	1m 0s		trunk passed
+1 💚	mvnsite	1m 21s		trunk passed
+1 💚	javadoc	0m 57s		trunk passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.11+9-Ubuntu-0ubuntu2.20.04
+1 💚	javadoc	1m 25s		trunk passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_292-8u292-b10-0ubuntu1~20.04-b10
+1 💚	spotbugs	3m 18s		trunk passed
+1 💚	shadedclient	25m 3s		branch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
			_ Patch Compile Tests _
+1 💚	mvninstall	1m 12s		the patch passed
+1 💚	compile	1m 17s		the patch passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.11+9-Ubuntu-0ubuntu2.20.04
+1 💚	javac	1m 17s		the patch passed
+1 💚	compile	1m 7s		the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_292-8u292-b10-0ubuntu1~20.04-b10
+1 💚	javac	1m 7s		the patch passed
+1 💚	blanks	0m 0s		The patch has no blanks issues.
+1 💚	checkstyle	0m 52s		the patch passed
+1 💚	mvnsite	1m 16s		the patch passed
+1 💚	javadoc	0m 47s		the patch passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.11+9-Ubuntu-0ubuntu2.20.04
+1 💚	javadoc	1m 19s		the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_292-8u292-b10-0ubuntu1~20.04-b10
+1 💚	spotbugs	3m 22s		the patch passed
+1 💚	shadedclient	24m 30s		patch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
			_ Other Tests _
-1 ❌	unit	332m 13s	/patch-unit-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs.txt	hadoop-hdfs in the patch passed.
+1 💚	asflicense	0m 39s		The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
		437m 11s

Reason	Tests
Failed junit tests	hadoop.hdfs.server.mover.TestMover

Subsystem	Report/Notes
Docker	ClientAPI=1.41 ServerAPI=1.41 base: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-3564/4/artifact/out/Dockerfile
GITHUB PR	#3564
Optional Tests	dupname asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall mvnsite unit shadedclient spotbugs checkstyle codespell
uname	Linux 2e8d77a878ae 4.15.0-143-generic #147-Ubuntu SMP Wed Apr 14 16:10:11 UTC 2021 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Build tool	maven
Personality	dev-support/bin/hadoop.sh
git revision	trunk / `275f817`
Default Java	Private Build-1.8.0_292-8u292-b10-0ubuntu1~20.04-b10
Multi-JDK versions	/usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64:Ubuntu-11.0.11+9-Ubuntu-0ubuntu2.20.04 /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64:Private Build-1.8.0_292-8u292-b10-0ubuntu1~20.04-b10
Test Results	https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-3564/4/testReport/
Max. process+thread count	1905 (vs. ulimit of 5500)
modules	C: hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs U: hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs
Console output	https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-3564/4/console
versions	git=2.25.1 maven=3.6.3 spotbugs=4.2.2
Powered by	Apache Yetus 0.14.0-SNAPSHOT https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

aajisaka

Thank you @ferhui @tasanuma @tomscut for your discussion and the update. LGTM.

tomscut · 2021-10-28T02:56:49Z

Thank you @ferhui @tasanuma @tomscut for your discussion and the update. LGTM.

Thanks @aajisaka for reviewing again.

tasanuma · 2021-10-29T01:27:48Z

Merged. Thanks for your contribution, @tomscut. Thanks for your review and discussion, @aajisaka and @ferhui.

…ort (#3564) (cherry picked from commit 6aa664c)

tomscut · 2021-10-29T01:30:58Z

Thanks @tasanuma @aajisaka @ferhui for your review and kind suggestions.

…ort (apache#3564)

HDFS-16279. Print detail datanode info when process block report

7cf5b29

use hostname instead of ip

9ea2416

print detail datanode info in processIncrementalBlockReport

a63addc

print dn info by default toString method

275f817

tasanuma approved these changes Oct 27, 2021

View reviewed changes

aajisaka approved these changes Oct 28, 2021

View reviewed changes

tasanuma merged commit 6aa664c into apache:trunk Oct 29, 2021

tasanuma pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 29, 2021

HDFS-16279. Print detail datanode info when process first storage rep…

7e57fc0

…ort (#3564) (cherry picked from commit 6aa664c)

tasanuma pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 29, 2021

HDFS-16279. Print detail datanode info when process first storage rep…

b1801e9

…ort (#3564) (cherry picked from commit 6aa664c)

HarshitGupta11 pushed a commit to HarshitGupta11/hadoop that referenced this pull request Nov 28, 2022

HDFS-16279. Print detail datanode info when process first storage rep…

32af1ac

…ort (apache#3564)

Conversation

tomscut commented Oct 19, 2021

Uh oh!

hadoop-yetus commented Oct 19, 2021

Uh oh!

tomscut commented Oct 20, 2021

Uh oh!

aajisaka commented Oct 20, 2021

Uh oh!

tomscut commented Oct 20, 2021 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

hadoop-yetus commented Oct 20, 2021

Uh oh!

tomscut commented Oct 22, 2021

Uh oh!

tomscut commented Oct 26, 2021

Uh oh!

ferhui commented Oct 26, 2021

Uh oh!

tomscut commented Oct 26, 2021

Uh oh!

tasanuma commented Oct 26, 2021

Uh oh!

hadoop-yetus commented Oct 26, 2021

Uh oh!

tomscut commented Oct 27, 2021

Uh oh!

tasanuma commented Oct 27, 2021

Uh oh!

tasanuma left a comment • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

tomscut commented Oct 27, 2021

Uh oh!

hadoop-yetus commented Oct 27, 2021

Uh oh!

aajisaka left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

tomscut commented Oct 28, 2021

Uh oh!

tasanuma commented Oct 29, 2021

Uh oh!

tomscut commented Oct 29, 2021

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

5 participants

tomscut commented Oct 20, 2021 •

edited

Loading

tasanuma left a comment •

edited

Loading