HADOOP-17930. implement non-guava Precondition checkState

[amahussein]

Description of PR

As part In order to replace Guava Preconditions, we need to implement our own versions of the API.
This Jira is to add the implementation checkState to the existing class org.apache.hadoop.util.Preconditions

How was this patch tested?

Extended the unit test org.apache.hadoop.util.TestPreconditions

• Added testCheckStateWithSuccess()
• Added testCheckStateWithFailure()

For code changes:

• Does the title or this PR starts with the corresponding JIRA issue id: HADOOP-17930
• Object storage: have the integration tests been executed and the endpoint declared according to the connector-specific documentation?

[hadoop-yetus]

🎊 +1 overall

Vote	Subsystem	Runtime	Logfile	Comment
+0 🆗	reexec	0m 58s		Docker mode activated.
			_ Prechecks _
+1 💚	dupname	0m 0s		No case conflicting files found.
+0 🆗	codespell	0m 0s		codespell was not available.
+1 💚	@author	0m 0s		The patch does not contain any @author tags.
+1 💚	test4tests	0m 0s		The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test files.
			_ trunk Compile Tests _
+1 💚	mvninstall	35m 39s		trunk passed
+1 💚	compile	22m 58s		trunk passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.11+9-Ubuntu-0ubuntu2.20.04
+1 💚	compile	19m 31s		trunk passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_292-8u292-b10-0ubuntu1~20.04-b10
+1 💚	checkstyle	0m 59s		trunk passed
+1 💚	mvnsite	1m 31s		trunk passed
+1 💚	javadoc	1m 2s		trunk passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.11+9-Ubuntu-0ubuntu2.20.04
+1 💚	javadoc	1m 33s		trunk passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_292-8u292-b10-0ubuntu1~20.04-b10
+1 💚	spotbugs	2m 22s		trunk passed
+1 💚	shadedclient	23m 59s		branch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
			_ Patch Compile Tests _
+1 💚	mvninstall	0m 56s		the patch passed
+1 💚	compile	22m 22s		the patch passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.11+9-Ubuntu-0ubuntu2.20.04
+1 💚	javac	22m 22s		the patch passed
+1 💚	compile	19m 35s		the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_292-8u292-b10-0ubuntu1~20.04-b10
+1 💚	javac	19m 35s		the patch passed
+1 💚	blanks	0m 0s		The patch has no blanks issues.
+1 💚	checkstyle	0m 58s		the patch passed
+1 💚	mvnsite	1m 30s		the patch passed
+1 💚	javadoc	1m 0s		the patch passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.11+9-Ubuntu-0ubuntu2.20.04
+1 💚	javadoc	1m 32s		the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_292-8u292-b10-0ubuntu1~20.04-b10
+1 💚	spotbugs	2m 32s		the patch passed
+1 💚	shadedclient	24m 12s		patch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
			_ Other Tests _
+1 💚	unit	17m 8s		hadoop-common in the patch passed.
+1 💚	asflicense	0m 48s		The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
		203m 7s

Subsystem	Report/Notes
Docker	ClientAPI=1.41 ServerAPI=1.41 base: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-3522/1/artifact/out/Dockerfile
GITHUB PR	#3522
Optional Tests	dupname asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall mvnsite unit shadedclient spotbugs checkstyle codespell
uname	Linux 294a5feabebf 4.15.0-142-generic #146-Ubuntu SMP Tue Apr 13 01:11:19 UTC 2021 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Build tool	maven
Personality	dev-support/bin/hadoop.sh
git revision	trunk / de1de7a
Default Java	Private Build-1.8.0_292-8u292-b10-0ubuntu1~20.04-b10
Multi-JDK versions	/usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64:Ubuntu-11.0.11+9-Ubuntu-0ubuntu2.20.04 /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64:Private Build-1.8.0_292-8u292-b10-0ubuntu1~20.04-b10
Test Results	https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-3522/1/testReport/
Max. process+thread count	2353 (vs. ulimit of 5500)
modules	C: hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common U: hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common
Console output	https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-3522/1/console
versions	git=2.25.1 maven=3.6.3 spotbugs=4.2.2
Powered by	Apache Yetus 0.14.0-SNAPSHOT https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

[amahussein]

@tasanuma and @virajjasani , can you please check the changes?

[tasanuma]

LGTM. +1.

[virajjasani]

+1 (non-binding)

[virajjasani]

Thanks for this, I think we can catchup on this later based on which PR goes first.

[tasanuma]

Merged it. Thanks for your contribution, @amahussein. Thanks for your review, @virajjasani.