-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9.2k
HADOOP-17620. DistCp: Use Iterator for listing target directory as well. #2861
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not over-enamoured of this test strategy. As well as being brittle, every use of this is going to complicate our move to Log4J2.
Is there any other way we could do this?
If the distcp test collected the IOStatistics of iteration, then those stores which returned it from iterators (s3a currently, abfs is still WiP) could count it and actually assert on real invocations. HDFS Doesn't do this.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanx @steveloughran, do you suggest that we should have two options like -useiteratorforsource and -useiteratorfortarget. Do you think in that case we would be able to save out on memory? since the target list is being build as part of CopyCommitter, so even if one takes the normal path, We would get OOM, just
whenwill differ?Regarding the log stuff, That was the only thing I could think of, to confirm if iterator was used. And during migration to Log4J2, Will moving to something like this will be of any help instead:
https://github.com/apache/hive/blob/master/ql/src/test/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/metadata/TestHive.java#L285
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So, Are you Ok with the other changes? This logger change we can not do now itself in the code, need to do during the migration itself, Was just trying to find a solution to the problem you told, or if there isn't any