YARN-10392: Fix typos Cotext related to AMRMProxyApplicationContext

[sungpeo]

Fix typos 'Cotext' to 'Context' related to AMRMProxyApplicationContext.getNMCotext()

[hadoop-yetus]

💔 -1 overall

Vote	Subsystem	Runtime	Comment
+0 🆗	reexec	24m 31s	Docker mode activated.
		_ Prechecks _
+1 💚	dupname	0m 0s	No case conflicting files found.
+1 💚	@author	0m 0s	The patch does not contain any @author tags.
-1 ❌	test4tests	0m 0s	The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch.
		_ trunk Compile Tests _
+0 🆗	mvndep	3m 16s	Maven dependency ordering for branch
+1 💚	mvninstall	28m 23s	trunk passed
+1 💚	compile	3m 26s	trunk passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.8+10-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu118.04.1
+1 💚	compile	2m 46s	trunk passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_252-8u252-b09-1~18.04-b09
+1 💚	checkstyle	1m 2s	trunk passed
+1 💚	mvnsite	1m 29s	trunk passed
+1 💚	shadedclient	18m 2s	branch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
+1 💚	javadoc	1m 7s	trunk passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.8+10-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu118.04.1
+1 💚	javadoc	0m 57s	trunk passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_252-8u252-b09-1~18.04-b09
+0 🆗	spotbugs	1m 43s	Used deprecated FindBugs config; considering switching to SpotBugs.
+1 💚	findbugs	3m 0s	trunk passed
		_ Patch Compile Tests _
+0 🆗	mvndep	0m 23s	Maven dependency ordering for patch
+1 💚	mvninstall	1m 22s	the patch passed
+1 💚	compile	3m 16s	the patch passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.8+10-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu118.04.1
+1 💚	javac	3m 16s	the patch passed
+1 💚	compile	2m 38s	the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_252-8u252-b09-1~18.04-b09
+1 💚	javac	2m 38s	the patch passed
+1 💚	checkstyle	0m 57s	the patch passed
+1 💚	mvnsite	1m 20s	the patch passed
+1 💚	whitespace	0m 0s	The patch has no whitespace issues.
+1 💚	shadedclient	15m 21s	patch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
+1 💚	javadoc	1m 1s	the patch passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.8+10-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu118.04.1
+1 💚	javadoc	0m 53s	the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_252-8u252-b09-1~18.04-b09
+1 💚	findbugs	3m 11s	the patch passed
		_ Other Tests _
+1 💚	unit	22m 6s	hadoop-yarn-server-nodemanager in the patch passed.
-1 ❌	unit	96m 18s	hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager in the patch passed.
+1 💚	asflicense	0m 29s	The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
		237m 53s

Reason	Tests
Failed junit tests	hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.TestFairSchedulerPreemption

Subsystem	Report/Notes
Docker	ClientAPI=1.40 ServerAPI=1.40 base: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-2199/1/artifact/out/Dockerfile
GITHUB PR	#2199
JIRA Issue	YARN-10392
Optional Tests	dupname asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall mvnsite unit shadedclient findbugs checkstyle
uname	Linux 073c06fc0ae6 4.15.0-112-generic #113-Ubuntu SMP Thu Jul 9 23:41:39 UTC 2020 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Build tool	maven
Personality	personality/hadoop.sh
git revision	trunk / a2610e2
Default Java	Private Build-1.8.0_252-8u252-b09-1~18.04-b09
Multi-JDK versions	/usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64:Ubuntu-11.0.8+10-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu118.04.1 /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64:Private Build-1.8.0_252-8u252-b09-1~18.04-b09
unit	https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-2199/1/artifact/out/patch-unit-hadoop-yarn-project_hadoop-yarn_hadoop-yarn-server_hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager.txt
Test Results	https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-2199/1/testReport/
Max. process+thread count	820 (vs. ulimit of 5500)
modules	C: hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-nodemanager hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager U: hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server
Console output	https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-2199/1/console
versions	git=2.17.1 maven=3.6.0 findbugs=4.0.6
Powered by	Apache Yetus 0.13.0-SNAPSHOT https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

[jiwq]

+1 Thanks @sungpeo for the contribution. The failed UT is not related to this patch.

[hadoop-yetus]

💔 -1 overall

Vote	Subsystem	Runtime	Logfile	Comment
+0 🆗	reexec	0m 51s		Docker mode activated.
			_ Prechecks _
+1 💚	dupname	0m 0s		No case conflicting files found.
+0 🆗	codespell	0m 0s		codespell was not available.
+1 💚	@author	0m 0s		The patch does not contain any @author tags.
-1 ❌	test4tests	0m 0s		The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch.
			_ trunk Compile Tests _
+0 🆗	mvndep	12m 29s		Maven dependency ordering for branch
-1 ❌	mvninstall	24m 16s	/branch-mvninstall-root.txt	root in trunk failed.
+1 💚	compile	3m 58s		trunk passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.13+8-Ubuntu-0ubuntu1.20.04
+1 💚	compile	3m 12s		trunk passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_312-8u312-b07-0ubuntu1~20.04-b07
+1 💚	checkstyle	1m 9s		trunk passed
+1 💚	mvnsite	1m 42s		trunk passed
+1 💚	javadoc	1m 25s		trunk passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.13+8-Ubuntu-0ubuntu1.20.04
+1 💚	javadoc	1m 13s		trunk passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_312-8u312-b07-0ubuntu1~20.04-b07
+1 💚	spotbugs	3m 20s		trunk passed
+1 💚	shadedclient	23m 44s		branch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
			_ Patch Compile Tests _
+0 🆗	mvndep	0m 23s		Maven dependency ordering for patch
+1 💚	mvninstall	1m 32s		the patch passed
+1 💚	compile	3m 49s		the patch passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.13+8-Ubuntu-0ubuntu1.20.04
+1 💚	javac	3m 49s		the patch passed
+1 💚	compile	3m 11s		the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_312-8u312-b07-0ubuntu1~20.04-b07
+1 💚	javac	3m 11s		the patch passed
+1 💚	blanks	0m 0s		The patch has no blanks issues.
+1 💚	checkstyle	1m 3s		the patch passed
+1 💚	mvnsite	1m 32s		the patch passed
+1 💚	javadoc	1m 12s		the patch passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.13+8-Ubuntu-0ubuntu1.20.04
+1 💚	javadoc	1m 7s		the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_312-8u312-b07-0ubuntu1~20.04-b07
+1 💚	spotbugs	3m 35s		the patch passed
+1 💚	shadedclient	23m 40s		patch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
			_ Other Tests _
+1 💚	unit	100m 20s		hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager in the patch passed.
+1 💚	unit	23m 9s		hadoop-yarn-server-nodemanager in the patch passed.
+1 💚	asflicense	0m 31s		The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
		246m 37s

Subsystem	Report/Notes
Docker	ClientAPI=1.41 ServerAPI=1.41 base: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-2199/1/artifact/out/Dockerfile
GITHUB PR	#2199
JIRA Issue	YARN-10392
Optional Tests	dupname asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall mvnsite unit shadedclient spotbugs checkstyle codespell
uname	Linux 98e965857df8 4.15.0-162-generic #170-Ubuntu SMP Mon Oct 18 11:38:05 UTC 2021 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Build tool	maven
Personality	dev-support/bin/hadoop.sh
git revision	trunk / 7865582
Default Java	Private Build-1.8.0_312-8u312-b07-0ubuntu1~20.04-b07
Multi-JDK versions	/usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64:Ubuntu-11.0.13+8-Ubuntu-0ubuntu1.20.04 /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64:Private Build-1.8.0_312-8u312-b07-0ubuntu1~20.04-b07
Test Results	https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-2199/1/testReport/
Max. process+thread count	864 (vs. ulimit of 5500)
modules	C: hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-nodemanager U: hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server
Console output	https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-2199/1/console
versions	git=2.25.1 maven=3.6.3 spotbugs=4.2.2
Powered by	Apache Yetus 0.14.0-SNAPSHOT https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

[github-actions]

We're closing this stale PR because it has been open for 100 days with no activity. This isn't a judgement on the merit of the PR in any way. It's just a way of keeping the PR queue manageable.
If you feel like this was a mistake, or you would like to continue working on it, please feel free to re-open it and ask for a committer to remove the stale tag and review again.
Thanks all for your contribution.