Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix protobuf class deep copy issue #13585

Closed

Conversation

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Dec 26, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (180ff97) 70.39% compared to head (85efe67) 70.32%.
Report is 2 commits behind head on 3.2.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              3.2   #13585      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   70.39%   70.32%   -0.08%     
==========================================
  Files        1606     1609       +3     
  Lines       69987    70048      +61     
  Branches    10097    10097              
==========================================
- Hits        49266    49258       -8     
- Misses      16089    16158      +69     
  Partials     4632     4632              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Jan 2, 2024

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

The SonarCloud Quality Gate passed, but some issues were introduced.

5 New issues
0 Security Hotspots
5.6% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

@namelessssssssssss namelessssssssssss changed the title Provides new ParamDeepCopyUtil to support protobuf class Fix protobuf class deep copy issue Jan 2, 2024
@namelessssssssssss namelessssssssssss deleted the 3.2-fix-triple-injvm branch January 2, 2024 09:17
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
3 participants