-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 986
DRILL-5796: Filter pruning for multi rowgroup parquet file #1298
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why check for
hasNonNullValue()does not apply anymore?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Condition tested inside checkNull when necessary
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think it is the same check. Can you check if
isAllNullsis equivalent to!hasNonNullValue()in which case consider replacingisAllNulls()on line 92.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In this particular case
isAllNulls()istrue(all 3 values arenull) and!hasNonNullValue()should be alsotrueas there are no nonnullvalues.Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Debugger :
System.out.println(leftStat) => min: false, max: false, num_nulls: 3
System.out.println(leftStat.hasNonNullValue()) => true
As you see, the function just states that min and max are defined, even if there are only nulls...
I think, the name of the function is not judicious. But it is a parquet lib function, and we can not modify it :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ok
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
When
isAllNulls()istrue,hasNonNullValue()must befalse, but ifisAllNulls()isfalse,hasNonNullValue()may betrueorfalsedepending on data type and whether or not min and max can be calculated (not all data type have a proper comparator). It means that check forhasNonNullValue()can't be dropped (it is invalid to access or compare generic Min and/or Max without first checking that they are set).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes I agree, but isn't it already checked in the previous function, matches?
public RowsMatch matches(RangeExprEvaluator evaluator) {
if (isNullOrEmpty(leftStat)) {
return RowsMatch.SOME;
}
...
return predicate.apply(leftStat, rightStat);
}
where
static boolean isNullOrEmpty(Statistics stat) {
return stat == null || stat.isEmpty();
}
where
public boolean isEmpty() {
return !this.hasNonNullValue && !this.isNumNullsSet();
}
When I call predicate.apply, the check for hasNonNullValue is already done.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It is possible that min and max are not set while the number of nulls is set, so
isEmpty()isfalse.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ok. hasNonNullValue() added in matches().