Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

branch-2.1: [fix](parquet-reader) Fixed the issue of excessive scanning data in late materialization‌ case of parquet reader #46121 #46183

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 30, 2024
Merged

branch-2.1: [fix](parquet-reader) Fixed the issue of excessive scanning data in late materialization‌ case of parquet reader #46121 #46183

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 30, 2024

Conversation

github-actions[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

Cherry-picked from #46121

@kaka11chen
[fix](parquet-reader) Fixed the issue of excessive scanning data in l…
ec05176 
…ate materialization‌ case of parquet reader (#46121)

### What problem does this PR solve?

Related PR: #40641

Problem Summary:

[Fix](parquet-reader) Fixed the issue of excessive scanning data in late
materialization‌ case of parquet reader introduced by #40641 in
scenarios with particularly high filtering rates.
@Thearas
Copy link
Contributor

Thearas commented Dec 30, 2024

Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris.
Don't know what should be done next? See How to process your PR.

Please clearly describe your PR:

  1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed.
  2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be.
  3. What features were added. Why was this function added?
  4. Which code was refactored and why was this part of the code refactored?
  5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization?

@dataroaring dataroaring reopened this Dec 30, 2024
@Thearas
Copy link
Contributor

Thearas commented Dec 30, 2024

run buildall

@doris-robot
Copy link

TeamCity be ut coverage result:
Function Coverage: 36.37% (9539/26225)
Line Coverage: 27.88% (78595/281878)
Region Coverage: 26.56% (40351/151897)
Branch Coverage: 23.32% (20437/87644)
Coverage Report: http://coverage.selectdb-in.cc/coverage/ec05176f5c5f4fd66da034a6212abc2f647616a2_ec05176f5c5f4fd66da034a6212abc2f647616a2/report/index.html

@morningman morningman merged commit 3d79955 into branch-2.1 Dec 30, 2024
17 of 19 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot deleted the auto-pick-46121-branch-2.1 branch December 30, 2024 23:30
@yiguolei yiguolei mentioned this pull request Jan 19, 2025
Open
@gavinchou gavinchou mentioned this pull request Feb 18, 2025
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
5 participants
@Thearas @doris-robot @morningman @dataroaring @kaka11chen