Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: support LargeList in cardinality #8726

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jan 5, 2024

Conversation

Weijun-H
Copy link
Member

@Weijun-H Weijun-H commented Jan 3, 2024

Which issue does this PR close?

Parts #8185

Rationale for this change

What changes are included in this PR?

Are these changes tested?

Are there any user-facing changes?

@github-actions github-actions bot added physical-expr Physical Expressions sqllogictest SQL Logic Tests (.slt) labels Jan 3, 2024
@Weijun-H Weijun-H mentioned this pull request Jan 3, 2024
19 tasks
.collect::<Result<UInt64Array>>()?;

let result = match &args[0].data_type() {
DataType::List(_) => {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Although this implementation is small, I think having a closure for generic array is still a good practice.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree it would be better to avoid the duplication if possible

Copy link
Contributor

@jayzhan211 jayzhan211 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

let list_array = as_large_list_array(&args[0])?;
generic_list_cardinality::<i64>(list_array)
}
_ => {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
_ => {
other => {
exec_err!(
"cardinality does not support type '{:?}'",
other
)
}

Copy link
Contributor

@alamb alamb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me -- thanks @Weijun-H

I think @comphead had a suggestion for improvement, but we could also do it as a follow on PR as well

Copy link
Contributor

@comphead comphead left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm thanks @Weijun-H

@comphead comphead merged commit af20d2d into apache:main Jan 5, 2024
22 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
physical-expr Physical Expressions sqllogictest SQL Logic Tests (.slt)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants