-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.2k
perf: Fix NLJ slow join with condition array_has
#18161
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from 1 commit
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -48,11 +48,15 @@ use crate::{ | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
| use arrow::array::{ | ||||||||||||||||||
| new_null_array, Array, BooleanArray, BooleanBufferBuilder, RecordBatchOptions, | ||||||||||||||||||
| UInt64Array, | ||||||||||||||||||
| }; | ||||||||||||||||||
| use arrow::buffer::BooleanBuffer; | ||||||||||||||||||
| use arrow::compute::{concat_batches, filter, filter_record_batch, not, BatchCoalescer}; | ||||||||||||||||||
| use arrow::compute::{ | ||||||||||||||||||
| concat_batches, filter, filter_record_batch, not, take, BatchCoalescer, | ||||||||||||||||||
| }; | ||||||||||||||||||
| use arrow::datatypes::{Schema, SchemaRef}; | ||||||||||||||||||
| use arrow::record_batch::RecordBatch; | ||||||||||||||||||
| use arrow_schema::DataType; | ||||||||||||||||||
| use datafusion_common::cast::as_boolean_array; | ||||||||||||||||||
| use datafusion_common::{ | ||||||||||||||||||
| arrow_err, internal_datafusion_err, internal_err, project_schema, | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
@@ -1661,11 +1665,30 @@ fn build_row_join_batch( | |||||||||||||||||
| // Broadcast the single build-side row to match the filtered | ||||||||||||||||||
| // probe-side batch length | ||||||||||||||||||
| let original_left_array = build_side_batch.column(column_index.index); | ||||||||||||||||||
| let scalar_value = ScalarValue::try_from_array( | ||||||||||||||||||
| original_left_array.as_ref(), | ||||||||||||||||||
| build_side_index, | ||||||||||||||||||
| )?; | ||||||||||||||||||
| scalar_value.to_array_of_size(filtered_probe_batch.num_rows())? | ||||||||||||||||||
| // Avoid using `ScalarValue::to_array_of_size()` for `List(Utf8View)` to avoid | ||||||||||||||||||
| // deep copies for buffers inside `Utf8View` array. See below for details. | ||||||||||||||||||
| // https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/18159 | ||||||||||||||||||
| // | ||||||||||||||||||
| // In other cases, `to_array_of_size()` is faster. | ||||||||||||||||||
| match original_left_array.data_type() { | ||||||||||||||||||
| DataType::List(field) | DataType::LargeList(field) | ||||||||||||||||||
| if field.data_type() == &DataType::Utf8View => | ||||||||||||||||||
| { | ||||||||||||||||||
| let indices_iter = std::iter::repeat_n( | ||||||||||||||||||
| build_side_index as u64, | ||||||||||||||||||
| filtered_probe_batch.num_rows(), | ||||||||||||||||||
| ); | ||||||||||||||||||
| let indices_array = UInt64Array::from_iter_values(indices_iter); | ||||||||||||||||||
| take(original_left_array.as_ref(), &indices_array, None)? | ||||||||||||||||||
| } | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Comment on lines
+1674
to
+1683
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I think this approach could be ported into datafusion/datafusion/common/src/scalar/mod.rs Lines 3238 to 3245 in 556eb9b
That being said, I think this is a nice point fix that we can safely backport to the datafusion 50 branch, so I think we should merge this PR / backport it and I will file a follow on PR to further improve the code |
||||||||||||||||||
| _ => { | ||||||||||||||||||
| let scalar_value = ScalarValue::try_from_array( | ||||||||||||||||||
| original_left_array.as_ref(), | ||||||||||||||||||
| build_side_index, | ||||||||||||||||||
| )?; | ||||||||||||||||||
| scalar_value.to_array_of_size(filtered_probe_batch.num_rows())? | ||||||||||||||||||
| } | ||||||||||||||||||
| } | ||||||||||||||||||
| } else { | ||||||||||||||||||
| // Take the filtered probe-side column using compute::take | ||||||||||||||||||
| Arc::clone(filtered_probe_batch.column(column_index.index)) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The root cause is tracked in
StringViewArray::slice()andBinaryViewArray::slice()are slow (they allocate) arrow-rs#6408