Skip to content

Conversation

@viirya
Copy link
Member

@viirya viirya commented Oct 1, 2024

Which issue does this PR close?

Closes #.

Rationale for this change

What changes are included in this PR?

How are these changes tested?

@mbutrovich
Copy link
Contributor

mbutrovich commented Oct 1, 2024

Do the benchmarks in

need to be updated? Part of my exploration today (that motivates this PR) is that the CometBaseBenchmark and by extension the CometAggregateBenchmark does not set Comet at the shuffle manager. CometExecBenchmark does set the shuffle manager:

@viirya
Copy link
Member Author

viirya commented Oct 1, 2024

Yea, we should update CometAggregateBenchmarks to enable shuffle for it.

@mbutrovich
Copy link
Contributor

This should help a lot for #987! Thanks for the quick fix!

@viirya viirya merged commit 18150fb into apache:main Oct 1, 2024
@viirya
Copy link
Member Author

viirya commented Oct 1, 2024

Thanks @kazuyukitanimura @mbutrovich

@viirya viirya deleted the disallow_final_object_hash branch October 1, 2024 23:15
@viirya viirya restored the disallow_final_object_hash branch October 1, 2024 23:15
@viirya viirya deleted the disallow_final_object_hash branch October 1, 2024 23:18
coderfender pushed a commit to coderfender/datafusion-comet that referenced this pull request Dec 13, 2025
## Which issue does this PR close?

<!--
We generally require a GitHub issue to be filed for all bug fixes and
enhancements and this helps us generate change logs for our releases.
You can link an issue to this PR using the GitHub syntax. For example
`Closes apache#123` indicates that this PR will close issue apache#123.
-->

Closes #.

## Rationale for this change

<!--
Why are you proposing this change? If this is already explained clearly
in the issue then this section is not needed.
Explaining clearly why changes are proposed helps reviewers understand
your changes and offer better suggestions for fixes.
-->

## What changes are included in this PR?

<!--
There is no need to duplicate the description in the issue here but it
is sometimes worth providing a summary of the individual changes in this
PR.
-->

```
cb3e977 perf: Add experimental feature to replace SortMergeJoin with ShuffledHashJoin (apache#1007)
3df9d5c fix: Make comet-git-info.properties optional (apache#1027)
4033687 chore: Reserve memory for native shuffle writer per partition (apache#1022)
bd541d6 (public/main) remove hard-coded version number from Dockerfile (apache#1025)
e3ac6cf feat: Implement bloom_filter_agg (apache#987)
8d097d5 (origin/main) chore: Revert "chore: Reserve memory for native shuffle writer per partition (apache#988)" (apache#1020)
591f45a chore: Bump arrow-rs to 53.1.0 and datafusion (apache#1001)
e146cfa chore: Reserve memory for native shuffle writer per partition (apache#988)
abd9f85 fix: Fallback to Spark if named_struct contains duplicate field names (apache#1016)
22613e9 remove legacy comet-spark-shell (apache#1013)
d40c802 clarify that Maven central only has jars for Linux (apache#1009)
837c256 docs: Various documentation improvements (apache#1005)
0667c60 chore: Make parquet reader options Comet options instead of Hadoop options (apache#968)
0028f1e fix: Fallback to Spark if scan has meta columns (apache#997)
b131cc3 feat: Support `GetArrayStructFields` expression (apache#993)
3413397 docs: Update tuning guide (apache#995)
afd28b9 Quality of life fixes for easier hacking (apache#982)
18150fb chore: Don't transform the HashAggregate to CometHashAggregate if Comet shuffle is disabled (apache#991)
a1599e2 chore: Update for 0.3.0 release, prepare for 0.4.0 development (apache#970)
```

## How are these changes tested?

<!--
We typically require tests for all PRs in order to:
1. Prevent the code from being accidentally broken by subsequent changes
2. Serve as another way to document the expected behavior of the code

If tests are not included in your PR, please explain why (for example,
are they covered by existing tests)?
-->
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants