Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: remove appveyor residual #909

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 29, 2020

Conversation

erisu
Copy link
Member

@erisu erisu commented Jan 29, 2020

Motivation and Context

Remove residual references of AppVeyor

Description

Removed from RAT and README

Testing

No Testing Required

@erisu erisu added this to the 9.0.0 milestone Jan 29, 2020
@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #909 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #909   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   65.94%   65.94%           
=======================================
  Files          21       21           
  Lines        1850     1850           
=======================================
  Hits         1220     1220           
  Misses        630      630

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 6372ca3...f9c5c67. Read the comment docs.

@erisu erisu requested review from breautek and dpogue January 29, 2020 07:07
Copy link
Member

@NiklasMerz NiklasMerz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@erisu erisu merged commit 8e98de6 into apache:master Jan 29, 2020
@erisu erisu deleted the chore/remove-appveyor-residual branch January 29, 2020 10:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants