-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix requirements error messages for JDK 8 #620
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #620 +/- ##
======================================
Coverage 64.7% 64.7%
======================================
Files 18 18
Lines 1816 1816
======================================
Hits 1175 1175
Misses 641 641
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
It's not just recommended, it's required. I tried this today and there is a flat out version check in the source code that locks it to JDK8. Also, added https to the download link as the site runs on that now. FYI if you don't have much time to research this then here is some help: I also worked with the cordova-android team to clarify this in their error messages and it's been accepted: - apache/cordova-android#619 - apache/cordova-android#620 If you look in the files changed the version check is just around those changed lines.
) It's not just recommended, it's required. I tried this today and there is a flat out version check in the source code that locks it to JDK8. Also, added https to the download link as the site runs on that now. FYI if you don't have much time to research this then here is some help: I also worked with the cordova-android team to clarify this in their error messages and it's been accepted: - apache/cordova-android#619 - apache/cordova-android#620 If you look in the files changed the version check is just around those changed lines.
Fixing the error message in response to discussion in #618.
I am not a super JDK 8 expert, would appreciate some feedback if my proposal looks good or not.
P.S. Fixed in another place in response to #619 (comment).