Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve the performance of TextSource by reducing how many byte[]s are copied (fixes #23193) #23196

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 15, 2022

Conversation

lukecwik
Copy link
Member

@lukecwik lukecwik commented Sep 12, 2022

This makes TextSource take about 2.3x less CPU resources during decoding.

Before this change:

TextSourceBenchmark.benchmarkTextSource        thrpt    5  0.248 ± 0.029  ops/s

After this change:

TextSourceBenchmark.benchmarkHadoopLineReader  thrpt    5  0.465 ± 0.064  ops/s
TextSourceBenchmark.benchmarkTextSource        thrpt    5  0.575 ± 0.059  ops/s

Fixes #23193


Thank you for your contribution! Follow this checklist to help us incorporate your contribution quickly and easily:

  • Choose reviewer(s) and mention them in a comment (R: @username).
  • Mention the appropriate issue in your description (for example: addresses #123), if applicable. This will automatically add a link to the pull request in the issue. If you would like the issue to automatically close on merging the pull request, comment fixes #<ISSUE NUMBER> instead.
  • Update CHANGES.md with noteworthy changes.
  • If this contribution is large, please file an Apache Individual Contributor License Agreement.

See the Contributor Guide for more tips on how to make review process smoother.

To check the build health, please visit https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/master/.test-infra/BUILD_STATUS.md

GitHub Actions Tests Status (on master branch)

Build python source distribution and wheels
Python tests
Java tests
Go tests

See CI.md for more information about GitHub Actions CI.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the java label Sep 12, 2022
@lukecwik
Copy link
Member Author

R: @bhisevishal

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Stopping reviewer notifications for this pull request: review requested by someone other than the bot, ceding control

…e copied (fixes apache#23193)

This makes TextSource take about 2.3x less CPU resources during decoding.

Before this change:
```
TextSourceBenchmark.benchmarkTextSource        thrpt    5  0.248 ± 0.029  ops/s
```

After this change:
```
TextSourceBenchmark.benchmarkHadoopLineReader  thrpt    5  0.465 ± 0.064  ops/s
TextSourceBenchmark.benchmarkTextSource        thrpt    5  0.575 ± 0.059  ops/s
```
@lukecwik
Copy link
Member Author

Run Java PreCommit

@lukecwik
Copy link
Member Author

Run Java_Examples_Dataflow PreCommit

Copy link
Member

@TheNeuralBit TheNeuralBit left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Please link the issue by adding "Fixes #23193" in the description.

* <p>We're reading data from inChannel, but the head of the stream may be already buffered in
* buffer, so we have several cases: 1. No newline characters are in the buffer, so we need to
* copy everything and read another buffer from the stream. 2. An unambiguously terminated line
* is in buffer, so we just create currentValue 3. Ambiguously terminated line is in buffer,
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: could this be an HTML ordered list?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done

@lukecwik
Copy link
Member Author

lukecwik commented Sep 15, 2022

LGTM

Please link the issue by adding "Fixes #23193" in the description.

Its already part of the description, what am I missing?

@TheNeuralBit
Copy link
Member

LGTM
Please link the issue by adding "Fixes #23193" in the description.

Its already part of the description, what am I missing?

You have it in the title, but not in the description. There's some documentation here: https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue

@lukecwik
Copy link
Member Author

LGTM
Please link the issue by adding "Fixes #23193" in the description.

Its already part of the description, what am I missing?

You have it in the title, but not in the description. There's some documentation here: https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue

That is an annoying limitation. Thanks for pointing it out.

@lukecwik
Copy link
Member Author

Run Spotless PreCommit

@lukecwik
Copy link
Member Author

Run Java PreCommit

@lukecwik lukecwik merged commit 30a48f0 into apache:master Sep 15, 2022
cushon pushed a commit to cushon/beam that referenced this pull request Oct 17, 2022
…e copied (fixes apache#23193) (apache#23196)

* Improve the performance of TextSource by reducing how many byte[]s are copied (fixes apache#23193)

This makes TextSource take about 2.3x less CPU resources during decoding.

Before this change:
```
TextSourceBenchmark.benchmarkTextSource        thrpt    5  0.248 ± 0.029  ops/s
```

After this change:
```
TextSourceBenchmark.benchmarkHadoopLineReader  thrpt    5  0.465 ± 0.064  ops/s
TextSourceBenchmark.benchmarkTextSource        thrpt    5  0.575 ± 0.059  ops/s
```

* Write file in pieces instead of pre-allocating entire buffer

* Address PR comments
johnjcasey added a commit to johnjcasey/beam that referenced this pull request Nov 21, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Feature Request]: Reduce number of byte[] copies in TextSource
2 participants