Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for FLOAT to Python RowCoder #22626

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 12, 2022

Conversation

TheNeuralBit
Copy link
Member

Part of #19815

This adds support for encoding the schema type FLOAT to Python's RowCoder. This is added in a new coder, SinglePrecisionFloatCoder, designed to be compatible with Java's FloatCoder.

GitHub Actions Tests Status (on master branch)

Build python source distribution and wheels
Python tests
Java tests
Go tests

See CI.md for more information about GitHub Actions CI.

@TheNeuralBit
Copy link
Member Author

@lostluck it looks like Go might be using the same coder for single-precision floats as for double-precision, is that right? From the Go PreCommit:

13:58:13 --- FAIL: TestStandardCoders (0.03s)
13:58:13     --- FAIL: TestStandardCoders/beam:coder:row:v1#06 (0.00s)
13:58:13         fromyaml_test.go:42: Failed "{beam:coder:row:v1 
13:58:13             
13:58:13             �f_float�����$8c97b6c5-69e5-4733-907b-26cd8edae612 [] false}": err decoding "\x01\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00": decoding a struct { F_float float32 "beam:\"f_float\"" }
13:58:13             	caused by:
13:58:13             error decoding double field
13:58:13             	caused by:
13:58:13             EOF
13:58:13 FAIL

@TheNeuralBit
Copy link
Member Author

TheNeuralBit commented Aug 8, 2022

Yes that does seem to be the case:

case reflect.Float32, reflect.Float64:
return typeEncoderFieldReflect{encode: func(rv reflect.Value, w io.Writer) error {
return EncodeDouble(rv.Float(), w)
}}, nil

Would you be opposed to me sending a change to encode as single-precision in that case?

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 8, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #22626 (bcb3822) into master (7a9bb76) will decrease coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 80.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #22626      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   74.19%   74.19%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         709      709              
  Lines       93499    93524      +25     
==========================================
+ Hits        69370    69387      +17     
- Misses      22852    22860       +8     
  Partials     1277     1277              
Flag Coverage Δ
python 83.59% <80.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...ks/python/apache_beam/coders/coders_test_common.py 98.54% <ø> (ø)
sdks/python/apache_beam/coders/coders.py 88.00% <63.63%> (-0.35%) ⬇️
sdks/python/apache_beam/coders/coder_impl.py 93.91% <85.71%> (-0.06%) ⬇️
sdks/python/apache_beam/coders/row_coder.py 94.64% <100.00%> (+0.14%) ⬆️
sdks/python/apache_beam/coders/slow_stream.py 94.69% <100.00%> (+0.19%) ⬆️
sdks/python/apache_beam/internal/metrics/metric.py 93.00% <0.00%> (-1.00%) ⬇️
...hon/apache_beam/runners/direct/test_stream_impl.py 93.28% <0.00%> (-0.75%) ⬇️
...eam/runners/portability/fn_api_runner/execution.py 92.44% <0.00%> (-0.65%) ⬇️
...ks/python/apache_beam/runners/worker/sdk_worker.py 88.94% <0.00%> (-0.16%) ⬇️
...on/apache_beam/runners/dataflow/dataflow_runner.py 82.87% <0.00%> (-0.14%) ⬇️
... and 3 more

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Aug 8, 2022

Assigning reviewers. If you would like to opt out of this review, comment assign to next reviewer:

R: @AnandInguva for label python.

Available commands:

  • stop reviewer notifications - opt out of the automated review tooling
  • remind me after tests pass - tag the comment author after tests pass
  • waiting on author - shift the attention set back to the author (any comment or push by the author will return the attention set to the reviewers)

The PR bot will only process comments in the main thread (not review comments).

@TheNeuralBit
Copy link
Member Author

Well I tried to modify Go's RowCoder but couldn't manage to get the test working right. Instead I've just skipped this case, and filed #22629 to track.

@TheNeuralBit
Copy link
Member Author

Run Java PreCommit

@TheNeuralBit
Copy link
Member Author

@AnandInguva do you have time to review this?

@AnandInguva
Copy link
Contributor

@TheNeuralBit I am on vacation. I will be back on Aug 22nd.

@TheNeuralBit
Copy link
Member Author

assign to next reviewer

@TheNeuralBit
Copy link
Member Author

R: @tvalentyn

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Stopping reviewer notifications for this pull request: review requested by someone other than the bot, ceding control

@TheNeuralBit
Copy link
Member Author

Oops Valentyn is also out

R: @ryanthompson591

@@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ var unimplementedCoders = map[string]bool{
var filteredCases = []struct{ filter, reason string }{
{"logical", "BEAM-9615: Support logical types"},
{"30ea5a25-dcd8-4cdb-abeb-5332d15ab4b9", "https://github.com/apache/beam/issues/21206: Support encoding position."},
{"8c97b6c5-69e5-4733-907b-26cd8edae612", "https://github.com/apache/beam/issues/22629: Support single-precision float."},
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Noting there's a race with #22664. Whichever is merged later should remove this exception.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@jrmccluskey this test case is still failing in Go. It looks like it may just be a test infra issue, but I'm not able to debug on my own. Could you take a look?

I'm re-opening #22629 to track

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you share the output from the test failure?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry I should have shared it to begin with but it had scrolled out of my shell history and I was lazy 😬

I dropped the log in #22629 (comment)

@TheNeuralBit
Copy link
Member Author

Run Go PreCommit

@@ -455,6 +455,17 @@ examples:

---

coder:
urn: "beam:coder:row:v1"
# f_float: float32
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why f_float instead of float or float32?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

f_float here is the name of a field in the schema. We could call it "float" or "float32" instead, but it's not that important. I just followed the f_ convention used elsewhere.

@@ -455,6 +455,17 @@ examples:

---

coder:
urn: "beam:coder:row:v1"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can you double check this is not a typo. For example with double this is:
beam:coder:double:v1

I would suspect this should be
beam:coder:float:v1

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is a reference to row coder:

Row Coder is a complex coder that is parameterized by a Beam Schema. It encodes different types of values by deferring to other coders, like beam:coder:double:v1 for DOUBLE

@TheNeuralBit TheNeuralBit merged commit 63ba9c7 into apache:master Aug 12, 2022
MarcoRob pushed a commit to MarcoRob/beam that referenced this pull request Sep 5, 2022
* Add support for FLOAT to Python RowCoder

* Skip the new test case in Go
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants