ARROW-11497: [Python] Provide parquet enable compliant nested type flag for python binding

[trucnguyenlam]

Hi,

I am making a PR following the discussion in ARROW-11497

This is my first PR to this project, please let me know if I'm missing something, I will try to address all problem as much as I can.

Cheers,
Truc

[github-actions]

Thanks for opening a pull request!

Could you open an issue for this pull request on JIRA?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW

Then could you also rename pull request title in the following format?

ARROW-${JIRA_ID}: [${COMPONENT}] ${SUMMARY}

See also:

• Other pull requests
• Contribution Guidelines - How to contribute patches

[github-actions]

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-11497

[emkornfield]

@trucnguyenlam thank you for the PR it looks like the CI failure is legitimate here.

Otherwise looks good to me

CC @jorisvandenbossche for python/cython style check

[trucnguyenlam]

@emkornfield thanks for your comment, I've also resolved python/cython style check, hopefully this should be good enough to be merged.

[trucnguyenlam]

@emkornfield @jorisvandenbossche Is it ok to be merged now? thanks

[jorisvandenbossche]

@trucnguyenlam it seems you have some unrelated changes included (some git problem I suppose). Can you rebase this on master?

[trucnguyenlam]

@jorisvandenbossche done rebase and expanded doc, please have a look if it is ok to merge

[trucnguyenlam]

@jorisvandenbossche please have a look if it is ok to merge? I resolved all issues as far as I know.

[trucnguyenlam]

@jorisvandenbossche could you please have a look at the PR? cheers

[trucnguyenlam]

@jorisvandenbossche @emkornfield this is open for quite some time, please have a look if this is eligible to be merged, thanks

[emkornfield]

+1, going to merge, we can address any items as a followup. @trucnguyenlam apologies for the delay.