Skip to content

Conversation

@vertexclique
Copy link
Contributor

@vertexclique vertexclique commented Nov 7, 2020

todos:

run on armv7:

  • gnu abi hf
  • gnu abi
  • musl abi hf
  • musl abi
  • android abi

run on armv6:

  • gnu abi hf
  • gnu abi
  • musl abi hf
  • musl abi
  • android abi

others:

  • start ci for armv7

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 7, 2020

Copy link
Contributor

@nevi-me nevi-me left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks like the main change is accounting for the pointer/usize size in tests, so I'm happy with this.
I didn't look at the bit_vec changes, as those are from the other PR. I'll come back to this after we address that PR

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I struggled to follow the arithmetic here, but perhaps I need to look at the spec again

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please do. Calculated nestedness and pointer table from my mind. Just tried to write a little bit more clearly which part of the pointers accounts for which part of the arrays with this pr.

@nevi-me
Copy link
Contributor

nevi-me commented Nov 19, 2020

@vertexclique would we be able to use https://crates.io/crates/cross for the armv7 CI?

@vertexclique
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yup, we can do that. I will remove all bit slice iterator implementation from this PR and make it only to work on arm LE. Then we can use it.

@nevi-me nevi-me added the needs-rebase A PR that needs to be rebased by the author label Nov 21, 2020
@vertexclique vertexclique force-pushed the ARROW-10513-enable-arrow-armv7 branch from 3e9cc40 to e27e127 Compare November 22, 2020 13:53
@vertexclique
Copy link
Contributor Author

@nevi-me enabled ci, let's see how it will go.

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the needs-rebase A PR that needs to be rebased by the author label Nov 25, 2020
@github-actions github-actions bot added the needs-rebase A PR that needs to be rebased by the author label Nov 28, 2020
@alamb
Copy link
Contributor

alamb commented Jan 13, 2021

@vertexclique -- Given the imminent Arrow 3.0 release, I am trying to clean up older Rust PRs and see if the authors have plans to move them forward.

Do you plan on working on this PR in the near future? If not, should we close this PR until there is time to make progress? Thanks again for your contributions so far.

@vertexclique
Copy link
Contributor Author

@alamb Thanks for reaching out! I don't have time to work on these PRs. Closing.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Component: Rust - DataFusion Component: Rust needs-rebase A PR that needs to be rebased by the author

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants