Skip to content

Conversation

@AntoinePrv
Copy link
Contributor

@AntoinePrv AntoinePrv commented Oct 27, 2025

Rationale for this change

Fix build with ARROW_SIMD_LEVEL=NONE and ARROW_RUNTIME_SIMD_LEVEL set to something else than NONE.

Are these changes tested?

Locally. Adding a CI test case with ARROW_SIMD_LEVEL=NONE may prove useful in preventing further regressions.

Are there any user-facing changes?

No

@github-actions
Copy link

⚠️ GitHub issue #47946 has been automatically assigned in GitHub to PR creator.

Copy link
Member

@raulcd raulcd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The current CI failures are unrelated to this PR, they are failing on main and other PRs, the CGLib Ruby is related to:

I've opened a new issue for the macOS ARM64 as I've seen it on a different PR too:

@github-actions github-actions bot added awaiting changes Awaiting changes and removed awaiting review Awaiting review labels Oct 27, 2025
@pitrou
Copy link
Member

pitrou commented Oct 27, 2025

@github-actions crossbow submit -g cpp

@pitrou pitrou added the CI: Extra: C++ Run extra C++ CI label Oct 27, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link

Revision: 14b0387

Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-2b86389ef5

Task Status
example-cpp-minimal-build-static GitHub Actions
example-cpp-minimal-build-static-system-dependency GitHub Actions
example-cpp-tutorial GitHub Actions
test-build-cpp-fuzz GitHub Actions
test-conda-cpp GitHub Actions
test-conda-cpp-valgrind GitHub Actions
test-cuda-cpp-ubuntu-22.04-cuda-11.7.1 GitHub Actions
test-debian-12-cpp-amd64 GitHub Actions
test-debian-12-cpp-i386 GitHub Actions
test-fedora-42-cpp GitHub Actions
test-ubuntu-22.04-cpp GitHub Actions
test-ubuntu-22.04-cpp-20 GitHub Actions
test-ubuntu-22.04-cpp-bundled GitHub Actions
test-ubuntu-22.04-cpp-emscripten GitHub Actions
test-ubuntu-22.04-cpp-no-threading GitHub Actions
test-ubuntu-24.04-cpp GitHub Actions
test-ubuntu-24.04-cpp-bundled-offline GitHub Actions
test-ubuntu-24.04-cpp-gcc-13-bundled GitHub Actions
test-ubuntu-24.04-cpp-gcc-14 GitHub Actions
test-ubuntu-24.04-cpp-minimal-with-formats GitHub Actions
test-ubuntu-24.04-cpp-thread-sanitizer GitHub Actions

@github-actions github-actions bot added awaiting change review Awaiting change review and removed awaiting changes Awaiting changes labels Oct 27, 2025
@pitrou
Copy link
Member

pitrou commented Oct 27, 2025

Sorry, there is a lint failure that needs fixing after my suggestion :(

Copy link
Member

@pitrou pitrou left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1, thank you!

Copy link
Member

@raulcd raulcd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the quick fix @AntoinePrv

@github-actions github-actions bot added awaiting merge Awaiting merge and removed awaiting change review Awaiting change review labels Oct 27, 2025
@pitrou
Copy link
Member

pitrou commented Oct 27, 2025

CI failures are unrelated.

@pitrou pitrou merged commit 00245cc into apache:main Oct 27, 2025
45 of 49 checks passed
@pitrou pitrou removed the awaiting merge Awaiting merge label Oct 27, 2025
@conbench-apache-arrow
Copy link

After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 4 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit 00245cc.

There were no benchmark performance regressions. 🎉

The full Conbench report has more details. It also includes information about 5 possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them.

@AntoinePrv AntoinePrv deleted the simd-level-none branch October 28, 2025 08:42
zanmato1984 pushed a commit to zanmato1984/arrow that referenced this pull request Nov 5, 2025
### Rationale for this change

Fix build with `ARROW_SIMD_LEVEL=NONE` and `ARROW_RUNTIME_SIMD_LEVEL` set to something else than `NONE`.

### Are these changes tested?

Locally. Adding a CI test case with `ARROW_SIMD_LEVEL=NONE` may prove useful in preventing further regressions.

### Are there any user-facing changes?

No

* GitHub Issue: apache#47946

Lead-authored-by: AntoinePrv <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Antoine Prouvost <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Antoine Pitrou <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Antoine Pitrou <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants