Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Also allow passing buffer instead of path for retrieve_file and store_file methods in SFTPHook #44247

Open
wants to merge 8 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

dabla
Copy link
Contributor

@dabla dabla commented Nov 21, 2024

In the FTPSHook it's also possible to pass a buffer (like StringIO/BytesIO) instead of a path, I've refactored the retrieve_file and store_file methods in SFTPHook so those also support those types. This avoids the need to create a file to be able to download a file to FTP, you can directly download it into a buffer and vice versa if you need to upload content to an FTP server you don't need to create a file locally to be able to upload it. I just delegate this to the underlying paramiko getfo and putfo methods, nothing fancy had to be done to achieve this as the paramiko library already supported this. This shortcoming was described as a pitfall for the SFTPHook.


^ Add meaningful description above
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named {pr_number}.significant.rst or {issue_number}.significant.rst, in newsfragments.

… and store_file methods in SFTPHook like it's the case in FTPSHook
@dabla dabla changed the title Also allow passing buffer instead of path for retrieve_file and store_file methods in FTPSHook Also allow passing buffer instead of path for retrieve_file and store_file methods in SFTPHook Nov 21, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants