Skip to content

Conversation

@mik-laj
Copy link
Member

@mik-laj mik-laj commented Oct 25, 2022

The PR #23961 added support for impersonation of service accounts, but at the same time limited the supported versions of Apache Beam to 2.39.0. This is a very big limitation considering that this functionality is not critical and many existing pipelines require an older version. On the other hand, this restriction is not checked if the user installs beam in a separate virtual environment. On the other hand, this restriction is not checked if the user installs beam in a separate virtual environment. Then Apache Beam starts, but unsupported options are passed.

To solve these two problems, I moved the Apache Beam version check to runtime and use the old version restrictions in providers.yaml.

Additionally, I will unblock the work on Snowpark integration which requires cloudpickle 2.0.0 while Apache Beam 2.39.0 requires cloudpickle 2.1.0.

CC: @lwyszomi

^ Add meaningful description above

Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named {pr_number}.significant.rst or {issue_number}.significant.rst, in newsfragments.

@mik-laj mik-laj requested review from kaxil and potiuk October 25, 2022 14:08
@mik-laj mik-laj requested a review from turbaszek as a code owner October 25, 2022 14:08
@boring-cyborg boring-cyborg bot added area:providers provider:Apache provider:google Google (including GCP) related issues labels Oct 25, 2022
@lwyszomi
Copy link
Contributor

@mik-laj LGTM

@potiuk
Copy link
Member

potiuk commented Oct 31, 2022

Tests failing though

@mik-laj mik-laj force-pushed the beam-old-versions branch 3 times, most recently from 16f5d3f to 5420b28 Compare November 4, 2022 16:21
@potiuk potiuk force-pushed the beam-old-versions branch from 5420b28 to 7e91f92 Compare November 7, 2022 02:04
@potiuk
Copy link
Member

potiuk commented Nov 7, 2022

Rebased- I have fixed the "backtracking" issue in main (some newly released dependencies caused back-tracking of pip resolver), so it should not fail this time.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area:providers provider:google Google (including GCP) related issues

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants