You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I found that MsSqlHook in get_conn method does not use extra parameters from airflow connection when creating PymssqlConnection. Thus, it is impossible to pass any special argument from the extra parameters of the airflow connection to pymssql.connect function.
I discovered this when I needed to pass the tds_version argument, because without it the connection to my database did not occur successfully.
Also, the documentation says that extra parameters can be used in MSSQL connection, but in fact this is not the case.
What you think should happen instead
I think the get_conn method should look something like this:
defget_conn(self) ->PymssqlConnection:
"""Return ``pymssql`` connection object."""conn=self.connectionextra_conn_args= {arg_name: arg_valforarg_name, arg_valinconn.extra_dejson.items() ifarg_name!="sqlalchemy_scheme"} # new code linereturnpymssql.connect(
server=conn.host,
user=conn.login,
password=conn.password,
database=self.schemaorconn.schema,
port=str(conn.port),
**extra_conn_args, # new code line
)
I tested it locally, and with this code the extra parameters are successfully passed to PymssqlConnection. And in my case the connection to the DB was successful.
I would also like to note that I added an excluding for the sqlalchemy_scheme parameter, because in the hook it is used in the sqlalchemy_scheme property, and in the pymssql.connect function it is not needed.
How to reproduce
To reproduce the bug, you should try to add any extra parameter to the airflow connection. And this will not affect the connection to the database, because the hook does not use extra parameters to create a connection to the database.
Anything else
I could probably create a PR with a fix, but since I'm new here, I assume that there might be a catch, and maybe it was intended that extra parameters not be passed to the pymssql connection (if so I wonder why). So, for now, I decided to just create an issue.
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue template! If you are willing to raise PR to address this issue please do so, no need to wait for approval.
Apache Airflow Provider(s)
microsoft-mssql
Versions of Apache Airflow Providers
apache-airflow-providers-microsoft-mssql==3.9.1
Apache Airflow version
2.9.2
Operating System
Ubuntu 22.04
Deployment
Docker-Compose
Deployment details
No response
What happened
I found that MsSqlHook in get_conn method does not use extra parameters from airflow connection when creating
PymssqlConnection
. Thus, it is impossible to pass any special argument from the extra parameters of the airflow connection topymssql.connect
function.I discovered this when I needed to pass the
tds_version
argument, because without it the connection to my database did not occur successfully.Also, the documentation says that extra parameters can be used in MSSQL connection, but in fact this is not the case.
What you think should happen instead
I think the get_conn method should look something like this:
I tested it locally, and with this code the extra parameters are successfully passed to
PymssqlConnection
. And in my case the connection to the DB was successful.I would also like to note that I added an excluding for the
sqlalchemy_scheme
parameter, because in the hook it is used in the sqlalchemy_scheme property, and in thepymssql.connect
function it is not needed.How to reproduce
To reproduce the bug, you should try to add any extra parameter to the airflow connection. And this will not affect the connection to the database, because the hook does not use extra parameters to create a connection to the database.
Anything else
I could probably create a PR with a fix, but since I'm new here, I assume that there might be a catch, and maybe it was intended that extra parameters not be passed to the pymssql connection (if so I wonder why). So, for now, I decided to just create an issue.
Are you willing to submit PR?
Code of Conduct
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: