-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 451
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Adds FateOperation type #5218
Merged
kevinrr888
merged 5 commits into
apache:main
from
kevinrr888:4.0-feature-fate-operation-type
Jan 7, 2025
Merged
Adds FateOperation type #5218
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
8da78ec
Adds FateOperation type
kevinrr888 8aa8d77
Fix thrift build error:
kevinrr888 ee7056a
Revert serialization changes
kevinrr888 30e4753
FateOperation enum refactor, new FateOperationTest
kevinrr888 ca23179
keeps enum ints stable
kevinrr888 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not sure if you have a test for this or not, but it would be good to add one that verifies that every TFateOperation has a FateOperation value and vice-versa. This would help with identifying additions / deletions in future releases.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
They are not exactly the same. FateOperation has a few more types than TFateOperation. TFateOperation only includes the types used in thrift. Some operations are performed outside of thrift (for example see CompactionCoordinator.java).
Could probably still write some sort of test for this PR though.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It might look a little redundant, but I wonder if FateOperation should be FateOperation(TFateOperation) with
null
being an acceptable value. You could still write a test to ensure that all TFateOperations have an associated FateOperation.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree a test would be good here, you could write something that iterates over TFateOperation values and verifies there's a matching value in FateOperation as @dlmarion mentioned. Because FateOperation is a super set this would catch any future additions to TFateOperation that were not properly added to FateOperation without having to change the test. There's probably not a good way to test the other way though.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the suggestions @dlmarion and @cshannon. I will add a test for this on Monday.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this is a good way to connect the two more explicitly. I added this and the test in 30e4753