Skip to content

Update CHANGELOG to mark v2.3.0 as released#6677

Closed
0xbrw wants to merge 1 commit intoanza-xyz:v2.3from
0xbrw:brw-update-changelog
Closed

Update CHANGELOG to mark v2.3.0 as released#6677
0xbrw wants to merge 1 commit intoanza-xyz:v2.3from
0xbrw:brw-update-changelog

Conversation

@0xbrw
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@0xbrw 0xbrw commented Jun 20, 2025

Summary of Changes

Mark 2.3.0 as released

@0xbrw 0xbrw changed the title Update CHANGELOG.md Update CHANGELOG to mark v2.3.0 as released Jun 20, 2025
@0xbrw 0xbrw marked this pull request as ready for review June 20, 2025 18:13
@0xbrw 0xbrw requested a review from a team as a code owner June 20, 2025 18:13
Comment thread CHANGELOG.md
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ Release channels have their own copy of this changelog:
* [stable - v2.1](https://github.com/anza-xyz/agave/blob/v2.1/CHANGELOG.md)

<a name="edge-channel"></a>
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

is 2.3 still supposed to point to edge?

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In previous release, it seems we landed the "update changelog" PR prior to branching. Ie, #6424 came in after we cut v2.3 if I'm not mistaken.

So, I think just BP'ing 6424 would keep us consistent with past releases

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yeah wasn't sure if BPing master update was right path or just deleting the channel indications

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, I could see just deleting the channel indications as v2.3 does go from beta to stable at some point, and keeping it noted here is just another thing to remember to update get out of date.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@willhickey any guidance here?

@steviez
Copy link
Copy Markdown

steviez commented Jun 25, 2025

@0xbrw - Per the discussion in above thread and some other discussion, we are going to follow this path:

  • Historically, the change to increment versions has landed prior to branches being cut
  • This go around, that ordering was NOT kept so v2.3 branch was created before 6424 landed
  • So, we're going to BP 6424 in order to keep the commit mapping as close as possible

I'm going to close this PR out as we should have it all patched up once the BP PR lands; thanks for catching this !

@steviez steviez closed this Jun 25, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants