Feature - Write lock demotion exemption for loader-v4#4575
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
this crate follows semver so this will probably have to wait until SDK crates are moved to a new repo and given a new release schedule
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Won't we have a new version bump before then? Also, we could deprecate the constructor and have a new one with the feature gating for consensus relevant call sites.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
haven't heard anything about 3.0 coming soon. I think the SDK repo is the most imminent thing that will enable this
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Do we have a rough time line? Otherwise I will look for alternative implementations
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@joncinque can comment on timeline
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think we discussed this offline last week, but for public visibility, the sdk will be moved into a new repo with the v2.2 branch cut, likely in the next 7-10 days.
After that point, we can consider making breaking changes to solana-message or any other crate. We need to choose what to do with solana-program and solana-sdk -- my inclination is to bump major versions much less often for them, or stop publishing updates altogether and encourage people to use the split-up crates.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
we'd need a similar piping of this variable to the transaction view; see ResolvedTransactionView::cache_is_writable and test_demote_writable_program in the same file.
Lichtso
force-pushed
the
feature/loader_v4_write_lock_demotion_exemption
branch
from
ce3fc48 to
ea0913b
Compare
Lichtso
force-pushed
the
feature/loader_v4_write_lock_demotion_exemption
branch
from
ea0913b to
850cfb5
Compare
|
This PR contains changes to the solana sdk, which will be moved to a new repo within the next week, when v2.2 is branched from master. Please merge or close this PR as soon as possible, or re-create the sdk changes when the new repository is ready at https://github.com/anza-xyz/solana-sdk |
4 participants
Problem
Split off from #2796.
Summary of Changes
Wires a
enable_loader_v4parameter through allMessageconstructors which then ends up inis_upgradeable_loader_present(). The parameter is abooland not&FeatureSeton purpose so that the feature check can be hoisted outside of loops at the call sites. All consensus irrelevant parts (such as tests, benchmarks and some tools) have it hard coded totrue.