Skip to content

Add tests for svm/transaction_processor.rs#112

Merged
LucasSte merged 3 commits intoanza-xyz:masterfrom
LucasSte:processor-tests
Mar 7, 2024
Merged

Add tests for svm/transaction_processor.rs#112
LucasSte merged 3 commits intoanza-xyz:masterfrom
LucasSte:processor-tests

Conversation

@LucasSte
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@LucasSte LucasSte commented Mar 6, 2024

Problem

Many functions in svm/transaction_processor.rs were missing tests.

Summary of Changes

I created the pertinent tests. More will come in other PRs.

@LucasSte LucasSte requested review from dmakarov and pgarg66 March 6, 2024 17:42
@LucasSte LucasSte marked this pull request as ready for review March 6, 2024 17:42
dmakarov
dmakarov previously approved these changes Mar 6, 2024
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@dmakarov dmakarov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Comment thread svm/src/transaction_processor.rs
Comment thread svm/src/transaction_processor.rs Outdated
@codecov-commenter
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 94.30380% with 18 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 81.8%. Comparing base (adefcbb) to head (411e765).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           master     #112    +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    81.8%    81.8%            
========================================
  Files         838      838            
  Lines      225913   226233   +320     
========================================
+ Hits       184935   185238   +303     
- Misses      40978    40995    +17     

@LucasSte LucasSte merged commit 85cfe23 into anza-xyz:master Mar 7, 2024
@LucasSte LucasSte deleted the processor-tests branch March 7, 2024 15:26
codebender828 pushed a commit to codebender828/agave that referenced this pull request Oct 3, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants