Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding the same package twice erroneously increments link counter #100

Closed
Tracked by #65
LordTermor opened this issue Jul 16, 2024 · 2 comments · Fixed by #135
Closed
Tracked by #65

Adding the same package twice erroneously increments link counter #100

LordTermor opened this issue Jul 16, 2024 · 2 comments · Fixed by #135
Assignees
Labels
bug Something isn't working Daemon Changes related to the backend

Comments

@LordTermor
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@LordTermor LordTermor added bug Something isn't working Daemon Changes related to the backend labels Jul 16, 2024
@LordTermor LordTermor self-assigned this Jul 16, 2024
@LordTermor LordTermor mentioned this issue Jul 29, 2024
40 tasks
@LordTermor LordTermor changed the title Adding the same package twise erroneously increments link counter Adding the same package twice erroneously increments link counter Aug 2, 2024
@romangg
Copy link
Contributor

romangg commented Aug 13, 2024

Why is this "ready for review" since last week but not yet "in review"?

@LordTermor
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Why is this "ready for review" since last week but not yet "in review"?

Because I've implemented it but PR is not created still.

LordTermor added a commit to LordTermor/bxt that referenced this issue Aug 13, 2024
LordTermor added a commit to LordTermor/bxt that referenced this issue Aug 22, 2024
LordTermor added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 26, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working Daemon Changes related to the backend
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants