Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added receptorctl work release documentation #1061

Merged

Conversation

thom-at-redhat
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@thom-at-redhat thom-at-redhat changed the title Added receptorctl work release docuemtnation Added receptorctl work release documentation Jun 6, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 7, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 42.70%. Comparing base (afb23cd) to head (d72fcf5).
Report is 64 commits behind head on devel.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##            devel    #1061      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   42.00%   42.70%   +0.69%     
==========================================
  Files          42       45       +3     
  Lines        6640     7220     +580     
==========================================
+ Hits         2789     3083     +294     
- Misses       3626     3915     +289     
+ Partials      225      222       -3     

see 7 files with indirect coverage changes

Components Coverage Δ
Go 42.12% <ø> (+0.12%) ⬆️
Receptorctl 49.31% <ø> (∅)

Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Jun 7, 2024

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarCloud

@thom-at-redhat thom-at-redhat merged commit fd9ad64 into ansible:devel Jun 11, 2024
21 checks passed
@thom-at-redhat thom-at-redhat deleted the add_receptorctl_work_release_doc branch June 11, 2024 14:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants