feat: add experimental support for Ruff language server#9125
Closed
vlashada wants to merge 1 commit intoanomalyco:devfrom
Closed
feat: add experimental support for Ruff language server#9125vlashada wants to merge 1 commit intoanomalyco:devfrom
vlashada wants to merge 1 commit intoanomalyco:devfrom
Conversation
- Introduced OPENCODE_EXPERIMENTAL_LSP_RUFF flag to conditionally enable Ruff language server functionality. - Implemented Ruff language server with support for Python file extensions and virtual environment detection.
Contributor
|
Thanks for your contribution! This PR doesn't have a linked issue. All PRs must reference an existing issue. Please:
See CONTRIBUTING.md for details. |
Contributor
|
The following comment was made by an LLM, it may be inaccurate: No duplicate PRs found |
Author
|
Sorry, made a mistake once again |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Add support for ruff to satisfy this issue #5345, where ty and ruff should be ran together: #5345 (comment)
Implementation is very close to the pull request for ty: #5575