Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug: Code Coverage Report #5526

Closed
niklas-wortmann opened this issue Mar 20, 2017 · 74 comments
Closed

Bug: Code Coverage Report #5526

niklas-wortmann opened this issue Mar 20, 2017 · 74 comments
Assignees
Labels
help wanted needs: investigation Requires some digging to determine if action is needed P1 Impacts a large percentage of users; if a workaround exists it is partial or overly painful type: bug/fix

Comments

@niklas-wortmann
Copy link
Contributor

- [x] bug report -> please search issues before submitting
- [ ] feature request

Versions.

$ ng --version
@angular/cli: 1.0.0-rc.2
node: 6.9.5
os: win32 x64
@angular/common: 4.0.0-rc.5
@angular/compiler: 4.0.0-rc.5
@angular/core: 4.0.0-rc.5
@angular/forms: 4.0.0-rc.5
@angular/http: 4.0.0-rc.5
@angular/platform-browser: 4.0.0-rc.5
@angular/platform-browser-dynamic: 4.0.0-rc.5
@angular/router: 4.0.0-rc.5
@angular/cli: 1.0.0-rc.2
@angular/compiler-cli: 4.0.0-rc.5

Repro steps.

I have made a sample project, to reproduce this weird behaviour.
Please take a look at: https://github.com/Loster102/angular-coverage-sample
When I run 'ng test -cc true', there is a successful testrun.
But when I look at the coverage report, the branch coverage is really strange.
It says, that the constructor is not fully covered.
sample

Desired functionality.

I would have expected that even the constructor is fully covered.

Mention any other details that might be useful.

In my real world application, there are some further strange behaviours, exactly like the one above.
I try to reproduce these in the sample project. In this application, I'm using [email protected] and @angular/[email protected].

@hotforfeature
Copy link

There are two related issues both in Istanbul and TypeScript:
gotwarlost/istanbul#690
microsoft/TypeScript#13455

The latest suggestion from both threads is to run tests with coverage targeting ES6 instead of ES5. Unfortunately from what I can tell, the Angular CLI doesn't use tsconfig.json when running tests, and the suggestions of using --compilerOptions '{\"target\":\"es6\"}' won't work since Angular CLI doesn't recognize that.

At the moment, there's nothing to do, adding /* istanbul ignore next */ comments everywhere around the constructor won't help. We're deadlocked while waiting for Angular, Istanbul, or TypeScript to change something.

@filipesilva filipesilva added needs: investigation Requires some digging to determine if action is needed P3 An issue that is relevant to core functions, but does not impede progress. Important, but not urgent type: bug/fix labels Mar 23, 2017
@filipesilva
Copy link
Contributor

If there's something we can do to help, we'd like to.

@stratus1011
Copy link

@hotforfeature you can actually change the "target" to es6 in the src/tsconfig.spec.json with the version of angular cli that you are using. However, if you are running tests on phantomjs it will fail due to the "const" keyword/ES6/ES2015 not being supported yet. There is a beta version of phantomjs that they have released that you could try which should have support for it, but may have other issues.

@sandman21dan
Copy link

tsconfig.spec file has es6 as a target, running on CLI-1.0.0 still get all the missing branches from all the constructors, maybe I'm missing something?

@cpa-level-it
Copy link

I have the same problem as @sandman21dan.
Changed target from es5 to es6 in tsconfig.spec.json and constructor branches are still not covered.

Any idea ?

@raguilera82
Copy link

Any solutions? It is really frustrating :/

@SURENDARREDDY
Copy link

Since it is being 2 months, just want to know the progress.
Is there any ETA for this issue resolution?

@cortopy
Copy link

cortopy commented May 29, 2017

Changing target to es6 in the main tsconfig.json doesn't work either

@rdsedmundo
Copy link

Same problem here.

@phillipzada
Copy link

phillipzada commented Jun 23, 2017

Anyone got anything on this issue resolution?

I found an ugly workaround. Set the constructor params to @Inject(TYPE) private variable: any resolves it but then you loose intellisence and type-checking.

@dinvlad
Copy link

dinvlad commented Jun 25, 2017

Changing to es6 doesn't work here as well. Is there a feasible solution in the works?

@rg1220
Copy link

rg1220 commented Jul 2, 2017

Reproduced this issue by simply adding http: HTTP to the constructor of a newly created project created with angular-cli: https://github.com/rg1220/angular-cli-coverage-issue-5526

screen shot 2017-07-02 at 9 20 11 am

@devoto13 devoto13 marked this as a duplicate of #7048 Jul 19, 2017
@filipesilva filipesilva added P1 Impacts a large percentage of users; if a workaround exists it is partial or overly painful help wanted and removed P3 An issue that is relevant to core functions, but does not impede progress. Important, but not urgent labels Jul 28, 2017
@brunolm
Copy link

brunolm commented Aug 18, 2017

I have the same issue :( ... Why is it blocked? Can we expect a fix in the near future?

@brunolm
Copy link

brunolm commented Aug 23, 2017

Workaround

As a workaround I found the special comment /* istanbul ignore next */

If you place after your class, the constructor gets ignored. Has to be exactly after the brace, do not break lines.

Example

export class InternalComponent {
    constructor(private authService: any) { 
    }
} /* istanbul ignore next */

Generates

define(["require", "exports"], function (require, exports) {
    "use strict";
    Object.defineProperty(exports, "__esModule", { value: true });
    var InternalComponent = (function () {
        function InternalComponent(authService) {
            this.authService = authService;
        }
        return InternalComponent;
    }()); /* istanbul ignore next */
    exports.InternalComponent = InternalComponent;
});

Which ignores this line exports.InternalComponent = InternalComponent; that causes the issue.

Note: If you have static members in your class add the comment after the last one, example:

static readonly authKey = 'access_token'; /* istanbul ignore next */

To ignore super

super() /* istanbul ignore next */;

If you have generics and/or @Inject in your constructor params, try to break lines.

With those hacks I got 100% coverage.

UPDATE: Well, yes, this is pretty ugly and might not work in all cases.

@kenisteward
Copy link

kenisteward commented Mar 4, 2018 via email

@ggarbereder
Copy link

+1

@mboughaba
Copy link

It seems most of the issues are solved nevertheless we are still experiencing same issue like @brunolm mentioned
image

@kellycrowther
Copy link

We are experiencing this in our project with constructors and decorators. Running angular 5.2.8, angular-cli 1.7.3, jasmine 3.1.0 running with karma.

@roupify
Copy link

roupify commented Mar 20, 2018

I resolve the problem by targetting es6 in tsconfig.spec.json

{
  "extends": "../tsconfig.json",
  "compilerOptions": {
    "outDir": "../out-tsc/spec",
    "baseUrl": "./",
    "module": "commonjs",
    "target": "es6",
    "types": ["jasmine", "node"]
  },
  "files": ["test.ts"],
  "include": ["**/*.spec.ts", "**/*.d.ts"]
}

@macbem
Copy link

macbem commented Mar 21, 2018

Just make sure that you have sourcemaps turned on for your tests and coverage will work fine.

@mboughaba
Copy link

mboughaba commented Mar 21, 2018

@macbem Not the case for me, I experience this problem with and without sm flag.

@kellycrowther
Copy link

Thanks for the suggestions @macbem and @rousseaufiliong. I previously tried those suggestions along with the other suggestions in this thread like adding /* istanbul ignore next */ and I tried again today for good measure but still find coverage is low for branches because of constructors and decorators. Hopeful an update solves this for our project

@tedp
Copy link

tedp commented Mar 27, 2018

Is a fix on the way?

@victormejia
Copy link

I experience this problem with having source maps turned off for testing.

@rafaelnery
Copy link

@filipesilva with version 1.7.4 the problem continues :(

@mcblum
Copy link

mcblum commented Jun 12, 2018

We're also still seeing the same problem, Angular 5.2.6, Jest 22.4.3 and Jest Angular Preset 5.2.2. For whatever reason, it's not all the time, but there are issues where some of the params in a constructor will be uncovered. It doesn't seem to make a lot of sense, because it's not consistent.

@soates
Copy link

soates commented Jun 15, 2018

Also seeing this behaviour as described by @mcblum

@dimitriy-k
Copy link

indeed, after adding --sourcemaps=false coverage started giving wrong numbers (cli 1.7.4, target es5). When you remove it, coverage is ok.

screenshot from 2018-06-20 10-55-28

@russcarver
Copy link

russcarver commented Jun 25, 2018

Same issues with Angular 5.2.11, Jest 23.1.0 and jest-preset-angular 5.2.2. All the istanbul packages pulled in (inspected via package-lock.json) also appear to be the latest.

        "istanbul-api": "^1.3.1",
        "istanbul-lib-coverage": "^1.2.0",
        "istanbul-lib-instrument": "^1.10.1",
        "istanbul-lib-source-maps": "^1.2.4",

I even tried upgrading to TypeScript 2.9.2 but no luck.

@aleh-vasilyeu
Copy link

Why is this issue closed?!
The problem still remains, here is an example of an empty component:
image

How can I fix this? Thanks.

@rmorrise
Copy link

rmorrise commented Jan 8, 2019

We fixed this by modifying angular.json to add the sourceMap flag:

The flag should be added under the following path: projects.my-app.architect.test.sourceMap

        "test": {
          "builder": "@angular-devkit/build-angular:karma",
          "options": {
            "main": "src/test.ts",
            "karmaConfig": "./karma.conf.js",
            "polyfills": "src/polyfills.ts",
            "tsConfig": "src/tsconfig.spec.json",
            "scripts": [],
            "styles": [
              "src/styles.css"
            ],
            "assets": [
              "src/assets",
              "src/favicon.ico"
            ],
            "sourceMap": true // <-- Add this flag!!
          }
        },

@rmorrise
Copy link

rmorrise commented Jan 8, 2019

Angular CLI team reported that newer CLI versions will correct this automatically:
#13093

@Javin007
Copy link

Angular CLI team lies. I'm running the latest angular/jest and still seeing this problem. NONE of the above "solutions" work. I've tried /* istanbul ignore next */, sourcemaps (both on and off) setting the target to es6, even adding the deprecated "mapcoverage" setting. Nothing works. Problem still exists without so much as a workaround. This is not a "closed" bug.

@ruimarques
Copy link

ruimarques commented Feb 14, 2019

Angular CLI team lies. I'm running the latest angular/jest and still seeing this problem. NONE of the above "solutions" work. I've tried /* istanbul ignore next */, sourcemaps (both on and off) setting the target to es6, even adding the deprecated "mapcoverage" setting. Nothing works. Problem still exists without so much as a workaround. This is not a "closed" bug.

Before calling a team as liars consider for a moment that you might be missing something or maybe you have encountered an edge case unknown to the community. If you provide a minimum reproducible example (created in stackblitz for instance) it would be more helpful to get your problem sorted out.

Also this issue was closed ages ago - a lot has happend to the CLI since. A regression might have happened in the meantime which, if confirmed, is a reason to reopen it.

@mcblum
Copy link

mcblum commented Feb 14, 2019

@Javin007 bro... come on. These are some of the most capable people working on software today, so the chances that they are lying to cover up a bug that, at its core, leads to an incorrect coverage report number are almost 0.

I'm using the latest CLI and Jest and ignore next works just fine. I would guess there is something else wrong with your setup.

Please consider the tone you take when commenting on projects which are free for you to use. No one owes you a fix, we're all in this together, and people are doing their best.

@Javin007
Copy link

@mcblum @ruimarques

I'm sorry if I come off as a bit irritated, but this is a very easily duplicated bug:

1.) Create new "hello world" project.
2.) Install Jest.
3.) Inject HttpClient into the app.component.ts
4.) Run tests with code coverage.

I JUST did it again to verify. It literally happens every time. On multiple versions of angular, and on every environment. And I've spent the last 48 hours searching for a solution, and have tried every single "fix" found on google to no avail. And this has been a problem for quite some time.

I'm not even saying it's specifically the Angular team's fault. It could very likely be a problem with Jest. However, claiming that "it's fixed" when it's not, and it's so easily duplicated is not helpful. Especially when I see numerous posts on numerous different sites (and even in this thread) claiming so without doing the very basic test outlined above. This original post was from March of 2017. It's now February of 2019, and this thread is a history of people continuing to have the exact same problem without a solution at any time. So this isn't just some problem that "cropped up again."

And yes, I'm irritated at spending two days of seeing people saying "it's fixed" when it simply isn't, and none of the MANY, MANY proffered solutions (everything from creating an entirely new project, to reinstalling angular) are anything but a waste of time. This kind of hand-waving away of the problem doesn't get it solved (obviously, since we're now on year two of the same issue).

If you actually have a solution that fixes the problem, then I and the many other people suffering from this problem would very much love to hear it. If you're not having this issue, then what is it that you're doing differently from the above steps? We would very much like to know.

@mcblum
Copy link

mcblum commented Feb 14, 2019

@Javin007 since even the steps you list above could result in a different version being installed on my machine than yours, could you please put the exact configuration in a StackBlitz so one of us can grab the code and see what's up? When you say "install jest" there are 1,000 different options, stable vs. alpha version of jest-preset-angular and a bunch of other things that can change, so put your exact configuration in a SB and we can see how you're getting the issue you're getting.

Once again, I'm currently, as I type, working on a large project using Angular CLI + Jest + Istanbul and all of my ignore statements work correctly.

@ahnpnl
Copy link

ahnpnl commented Feb 14, 2019

I will drop one cent here:

  • first of all, the issue with coverage constructor when using jest with Angular CLI isn't in Angular CLI fix because Angular CLI only fixed for karma + Jasmine.
  • jest-preset-angular 7.0.0-alpha.1 fixed the issue with coverage when using jest. However we are trying to make jest-preset-angular to be compatible with jest 24 at the same time. Being compatible with jest 24 + alpha version work are 2 big breaking changes and require some times to release an official version.

@Javin007
Copy link

FWIW: Here's a project that has the problem: https://yqnigwvz.github.stackblitz.io

@mcblum
Copy link

mcblum commented Feb 14, 2019

@Javin007 could you try with the following:

"jest": "23.6.0",
"jest-preset-angular": "7.0.0-alpha.2",

You will need to change your jest config when you update to the alpha of jest-preset-angular. It looks something like this:

"jest": {
    "preset": "jest-preset-angular",
    "setupFiles": [
      "jest-canvas-mock"
    ],
    "setupTestFrameworkScriptFile": "<rootDir>/config/jest/config.ts",
    "transformIgnorePatterns": [
      "<rootDir>/node_modules/(?!@ngrx|@agm)"
    ],
    "transform": {
      "^.+\\.js": "<rootDir>/node_modules/babel-jest",
      "^.+\\.(ts|html)$": "ts-jest"
    },
    "globals": {
      "ts-jest": {
        "tsConfig": "<rootDir>/tsconfig.spec.json",
        "diagnostics": false,
        "stringifyContentPathRegex": "\\.html$",
        "astTransformers": [
          "jest-preset-angular/InlineHtmlStripStylesTransformer.js"
        ]
      },
      "window": true
    },
    "modulePathIgnorePatterns": [
      "<rootDir>/coverage/",
      "<rootDir>/.storybook/",
      "<rootDir>/config/",
      "<rootDir>/dist/",
      "<rootDir>/e2e/",
      "<rootDir>/node_modules/"
    ],
    "collectCoverageFrom": [
      "{apps|libs}/**/src/**/*.ts"
    ],
    "coverageThreshold": {
      "global": {
        "statements": 90,
        "branches": 90,
        "functions": 90,
        "lines": 90
      }
    },
    "testMatch": [
      "**/__tests__/**/*.ts?(x)",
      "**/?(*.)+(spec).ts?(x)"
    ],
    "snapshotSerializers": [
      "jest-preset-angular/AngularSnapshotSerializer.js",
      "jest-preset-angular/HTMLCommentSerializer.js"
    ]
  }

Obviously you'll need to change everything that's different, this is just from my project. Upgrading to the alpha version and sticking with Jest 23 for now should fix it.

@Javin007
Copy link

Javin007 commented Feb 14, 2019

It does indeed seem to be working now. So it would seem it's the fix is indeed in the Jest alpha. Thanks for your help!

@angular-automatic-lock-bot
Copy link

This issue has been automatically locked due to inactivity.
Please file a new issue if you are encountering a similar or related problem.

Read more about our automatic conversation locking policy.

This action has been performed automatically by a bot.

@angular-automatic-lock-bot angular-automatic-lock-bot bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 9, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
help wanted needs: investigation Requires some digging to determine if action is needed P1 Impacts a large percentage of users; if a workaround exists it is partial or overly painful type: bug/fix
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests