Clean package names found in python catalogers#1417
Merged
Conversation
kzantow
approved these changes
Dec 20, 2022
Benchmark Test ResultsBenchmark results from the latest changes vs base branch |
Signed-off-by: Alex Goodman <alex.goodman@anchore.com>
f06afa1 to
8a36d2c
Compare
This was referenced Dec 23, 2022
Closed
Closed
This was referenced Jan 4, 2023
Closed
Closed
GijsCalis
pushed a commit
to GijsCalis/syft
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 19, 2024
Signed-off-by: Alex Goodman <alex.goodman@anchore.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Goodman <alex.goodman@anchore.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR fixes a couple of bugs:
setup.pypackage names (for dynamically crafted require lines, such as%sor{}) we should skip these linesrequirements.txtfiles (such as==1.2.3) we should skip these lines