-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 383
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Gutenberg] Add AMP Carousel for Gallery and AMP Lightbox features for Gallery and Image #1121
Conversation
|
||
$attributes = array( | ||
'width' => self::FALLBACK_WIDTH, | ||
'height' => self::FALLBACK_HEIGHT, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not sure what could be a better alternative for setting width and height. Thoughts?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could the AMP_Gallery_Block_Sanitizer
get added to the sanitizers list so that it is forced to be run after the AMP_Img_Sanitizer
? Then you would be able to use the width
and height
of the images inside of the gallery to obtain the width
and height
for the overall gallery?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Added AMP_Gallery_Block_Sanitize::get_carousel_height()
which gets the heights of the images and sets the gallery height according to the smallest image. However, saw that basically all the images had the default height and width set (400px
) within AMP_Image_Sanitizer::determine_dimensions()
, so also added AMP_Base_Sanitizer::set_attachment_width_and_height_by_src()
which gets the height and width from the image itself and is used in AMP_Image_Sanitizer::determine_dimensions()
before the logic that adds the fallback width and height. Does this make sense, or does it interfere with the logic that sets the fallback width and height?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thinking that this might also change the looks for default gallery in an unexpected way.
Note: Also added |
assets/js/amp-editor-blocks.js
Outdated
} | ||
|
||
if ( '' !== ampClassName && attributes.className !== ampClassName ) { | ||
props.className = ampClassName.trim(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey @kienstra, thanks for finding this, makes sense that the props.className
can't be directly set this way.
…dd/amp-carousel-toggle
@@ -211,6 +242,15 @@ var ampEditorBlocks = ( function() { | |||
ampLayout = attributes.ampLayout; | |||
|
|||
if ( 'core/shortcode' === name ) { | |||
// Lets remove amp-carousel from edit view. | |||
if ( component.hasGalleryShortcodeCarouselAttribute( attributes.text || '' ) ) { | |||
props.setAttributes( { text: component.removeAmpCarouselFromShortcodeAtts( attributes.text ) } ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This will need to be moved to an onChange
handler.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm, removing the attributes from the saved shortcode text on loading the block isn't related to any other attribute changing, the objective here was to not display the saved attributes within the shortcode already when the block is initially loaded, e.g. display just [gallery]
instead of [gallery amp-lightbox=true]
. Moving this part to onChange
handler would cause the AMP attributes show up when first loading the block and remove these once onChange
triggers.
Should we just display the attributes (in case they're not default) within the shortcode instead of trying to hide them? Thoughts?
} | ||
// Lets remove amp-lightbox from edit view. | ||
if ( component.hasGalleryShortcodeLightboxAttribute( attributes.text || '' ) ) { | ||
props.setAttributes( { text: component.removeAmpLightboxFromShortcodeAtts( attributes.text ) } ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Per above, this will need to be moved to an onChange
handler.
assets/css/amp-default.css
Outdated
@@ -3,3 +3,11 @@ | |||
/** Force the image into a box of fixed dimensions and use object-fit to scale. **/ | |||
object-fit: contain; | |||
} | |||
|
|||
#amp-image-lightbox-1 img { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think we should be targeting img
elements in selectors. I should think that only targeting amp-img
should be done since img
should really be the domain of the amp-img
to control?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks like amp-image-lightbox
component is empty by default and clicking on image which is targeting this lightbox will insert the img
element into the amp-image-lightbox
, the amp-image-lightbox
component doesn't include an additional amp-img
component within, targeting amp-img
doesn't seem to be possible in this case.
For example after clicking on an an image the lightbox HTML looks like this:
Thoughts?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Changed to use AMP-generated class instead of img
within 6900e2b.
onChange: function( value ) { | ||
props.setAttributes( { ampLayout: value } ); | ||
if ( 'core/image' === props.name ) { | ||
component.setImageBlockLayoutAttributes( props, value ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Per above, this will need to be moved to an onChange
handler.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This one is already in onChange
handler.
$lightbox_tag = AMP_HTML_Utils::build_tag( | ||
'amp-image-lightbox', | ||
array( | ||
'id' => AMP_Base_Sanitizer::AMP_IMAGE_LIGHTBOX_ID, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why the static 'amp-image-lightbox-1'
? Should this not have some auto-increment number instead that is appended?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Used 'amp-image-lightbox-1'
originally since thought that maybe there will be more than one, however, looks like using one should be enough, maybe we could just leave it as 'amp-image-lightbox'
. Thoughts?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Changed to amp-image-lightbox
.
@@ -384,6 +396,12 @@ public function filter_data_amp_attributes( $attributes, $amp_data ) { | |||
if ( isset( $amp_data['noloading'] ) ) { | |||
$attributes['data-amp-noloading'] = ''; | |||
} | |||
if ( isset( $amp_data['lightbox'] ) ) { | |||
$attributes['data-amp-lightbox'] = ''; | |||
$attributes['on'] = 'tap:' . self::AMP_IMAGE_LIGHTBOX_ID; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Per above, I think this needs to auto-increment a number to append to amp-image-lightbox-
.
* Let gallery have be sized according to the max height. * Constrain height of AMP gallery carousel by ratio with max width * Remove duplicate data for jed_locale_data.
b2382d7
to
201654f
Compare
For some reason I get this warning when I click the Carousel or Lightbox toggles the first time:
|
…ve non-standard entry__content
assets/css/amp-default.css
Outdated
} | ||
|
||
.entry__content .wp-block-gallery[class*="columns-"] figure { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
entry__content
is not a standard class name.
assets/css/amp-default.css
Outdated
|
||
#amp-image-lightbox div div > :first-child { | ||
object-fit: contain; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This doesn't seem to be having any effect. I don't think it is needed?
assets/css/amp-default.css
Outdated
|
||
.entry__content .wp-block-gallery[class*="columns-"] figure { | ||
width: 100%; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this may just be needed in the ampnews theme. It doesn't seem necessary in Twenty Fifteen. It's probably just that the ampnews theme lacks all of the required styles.
041311c
to
dbe281c
Compare
$amp_carousel->appendChild( $images->item( $j ) ); | ||
) ); | ||
foreach ( $images as $image ) { | ||
$amp_carousel->appendChild( $image ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@westonruter for ( $j = $num_images - 1; $j >= 0; $j-- ) {
was used here since when looping directly through the nodes (foreach ( $images as $image ) {
) it's not working as expected, for example when adding a gallery with 5 images locally and using AMP Carousel it will just display the first three in the gallery. That's happening when testing locally now as well, is it working as expected for you?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@miina you're absolutely right. I broke it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
PR to fix opened in #1187.
Request For Testing Hi @csossi,
|
@kienstra - Works fine on front-end, but noted that a message appeared in the admin on publishing post. Not sure if relevant here, but wanted you to see it: |
Thanks, Should Be Fine Hi @csossi, |
Based on #1026.
Does the following: