If no decorator is found, fall back to decorators for parent classes #19
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I use single table inheritance quite a lot so I made this in order to avoid having to create a decorator for every single child class if all I need is common functionality.
With this change, a class
Child
that inherits fromParent
will be decorated withParentDecorator
if noChildDecorator
exists.I considered making it so that both
ChildDecorator
andParentDecorator
would be included of both exist but I am not sure if that is a good idea. Now I just includeParentDecorator
in myChildDecorator
manually which works just fine.