Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(sec): upgrade com.google.protobuf:protobuf-java to 3.16.1 #4445

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

zhoumengyks
Copy link

What happened?

There are 2 security vulnerabilities found in com.google.protobuf:protobuf-java 2.5.0

What did I do?

Upgrade com.google.protobuf:protobuf-java from 2.5.0 to 3.16.1 for vulnerability fix

What did you expect to happen?

Ideally, no insecure libs should be used.

The specification of the pull request

PR Specification from OSCS

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.


zhoumengyks seems not to be a GitHub user. You need a GitHub account to be able to sign the CLA. If you have already a GitHub account, please add the email address used for this commit to your account.
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

1 similar comment
@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.


zhoumengyks seems not to be a GitHub user. You need a GitHub account to be able to sign the CLA. If you have already a GitHub account, please add the email address used for this commit to your account.
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants