CI: remove t.Parallel() from TestAbsentTracking#6415
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Summary of Changes
Hello @cce, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request addresses flakiness in the TestAbsentTracking function by removing its t.Parallel() call. The test is identified as resource-intensive and prone to flakiness due to heavy disk usage, and this change aims to stabilize its execution.
Highlights
- Test Flakiness Mitigation: Removed t.Parallel() from TestAbsentTracking in ledger/eval_simple_test.go to address flakiness, as this test is resource-intensive and interacts heavily with disk.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request removes t.Parallel() from the TestAbsentTracking test to make it less flaky in CI. Given that this is a resource-intensive test, running it sequentially is a sensible approach to improve stability by avoiding resource contention. The change is minimal, targeted, and well-justified. I approve.
Summary
A tiny change to make this resource-intensive test a little less flaky.
Test Plan
Should pass