Readme fix

[tzaffi]

Fixing the last Q/A and removing the msgpack output which lulled me into falsely believing that the box create actually worked.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #4141 (f9dc409) into feature/avm-box (10e29e1) will decrease coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

❗ Current head f9dc409 differs from pull request most recent head 0e844ce. Consider uploading reports for the commit 0e844ce to get more accurate results

@@                 Coverage Diff                 @@
##           feature/avm-box    #4141      +/-   ##
===================================================
- Coverage            54.56%   54.55%   -0.01%     
===================================================
  Files                  392      392              
  Lines                49085    49085              
===================================================
- Hits                 26782    26779       -3     
- Misses               20047    20051       +4     
+ Partials              2256     2255       -1     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
util/metrics/reporter.go	56.31% <0.00%> (-4.86%)	⬇️
ledger/blockqueue.go	82.18% <0.00%> (-2.88%)	⬇️
ledger/tracker.go	73.16% <0.00%> (-1.30%)	⬇️
data/transactions/verify/txn.go	44.15% <0.00%> (-0.87%)	⬇️
network/wsPeer.go	67.67% <0.00%> (-0.83%)	⬇️
network/wsNetwork.go	64.70% <0.00%> (-0.20%)	⬇️
ledger/acctupdates.go	64.89% <0.00%> (+0.60%)	⬆️
cmd/tealdbg/debugger.go	73.49% <0.00%> (+0.80%)	⬆️
crypto/merkletrie/node.go	93.48% <0.00%> (+1.86%)	⬆️
crypto/merkletrie/trie.go	68.61% <0.00%> (+2.18%)	⬆️
... and 1 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 10e29e1...0e844ce. Read the comment docs.

[tzaffi]

Hopefully my final question @jannotti :

Is this overkill? Should I try and fund with the minimum necessary to run the example?

[jannotti]

Hopefully my final question @jannotti :

Is this overkill? Should I try and fund with the minimum necessary to run the example?

I think it's fine either way, I don't expect anyone reading this doc is worried about following it to the letter.

A nice addition, in another PR, would be showing how to add another user account. I imagine that devs might need that next. They have one well-funded account, how do they do things between two different accounts with a minimum of fuss? Only then might you worry about give too much money out to the other accounts.